Hey You!
Here are all the statements that apply:
1. France thought the treaty was not tough enough on Germany.
2. Germany was unhappy it could not participate in the treaty negotiations.
4. Great Britain feared that the treaty was too harsh on Germany.
6. Japan was unhappy that its contribution to the war effort had gone unrewarded.
7. Germany resented the fact that it had to sign the treaty or face invasion.
Answers to #1:
Raphael Lemkin's definition of genocide was not accepted until after the Holocaust.
Raphael Lemkin had been studying the problem of mass killings of a people group since the 1920s, in regard to Turkish slaughter of Armenians in 1915. He coined the term "genocide" in 1944, in reference then also to the Holocaust. The term uses Greek language roots and means "killing of a race" of people. Lemkin served as an advisor to Justice Robert Jackson, the lead prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials. "Crimes against humanity" was the charge used at the Nuremberg trials, since no international legal definition of "genocide" had yet been accepted. Ultimately, Lemkin was able to persuade the United Nations to accept the definition of genocide and codify it into international law. In December, 1948, the United Nations adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which made use of a number of Lemkin's ideas on the subject.
#2: For item #2, you didn't ask a question, so I won't attempt to guess at what question you might have in mind. The definition as you quote it comes from Article II of the UN's Genocide Convention. Article III also indicts intention and conspiracy to commit genocide as crimes against international law. Article IV of that same Convention then puts teeth into the UN's action, saying, "Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals."
The answer is <span>It allows readers to approach a “forbidden door.” </span>
Answer:
a man walking into his backyard
far away
Explanation:
just did it
It basically gives stability and tranquility to all the states, if the federal government is too much, stronger states can prey on weaker states looking for their wealth. The Federal System stablishes general rule sto be shared with all the states and the states have their degree of freedom to enfore some laws according to their own context.
