Answer:
-The preceding paragraph was about crime movies.
-The essay compares genres of visual crime fiction.
-This paragraph will offer details about episodic crime series.
-The later paragraphs will present a comparison of the genres.
2,3,5,and 6.
Explanation:
The sentence does not talk about books (1) or anything about artistic ways. (4)
A. "It was a dead mans house, a spirit house" it's the only quote that even mentions religion in any way. Lmk if it's right!
Answer:
meat-eaters believe that meat eaters share an uneasy piece with vegans
Wednesday, April 20.
Dear Diary.
Today has been a bittersweet day, because I have a confusion of happy and sad thoughts even though it has made me strange. In fact, I'm sad about the direction my life is taking. That's because, today, I received the news that I was approved iiT, my classification was one of the best, which made me very happy. However, I soon received the news that I could not start the course in IIT, which ended all my happiness, left me distressed and aimless. That's because my father said that we don't have enough economic conditions to pay the fees that the course requires.
Although I am sad, I know that I cannot change that and I need to compose myself and strive to change this situation and be able to project my dreams again.
Essay claim: Requiring <em><u>voters</u></em> to <u><em>present picture</em></u> identification <u><em>reduces</em></u> voter participation.
<em><u>Many</u></em> people <u><em>lack</em></u> photo identification. Requiring <em><u>picture identification to vote would keep those without</u></em> it from voting. Elderly <em><u>people who no longer drive and people </u></em>who <em><u>live </u></em>in<em><u> low-income</u></em> areas often <em><u>lack</u></em> identification. They would be <em><u>unable</u></em> to vote. Mark Abernathy <u><em>argues</em></u>, "Requiring photo ID to vote <em><u>effectively</u></em> eliminates a <em><u>large group</u></em> of American voters. <em><u>However</u></em>, they are denied a basic <em><u>privilege given to all Americans over the age of 18</u></em>. A <em><u>part</u></em> of the population, not the entire population, <em><u>decides</u></em> elections" <em><u>" (page 820 of the article "Photo Identification Disenfranchisement").</u></em> Some <u><em>believe</em></u> this <em><u>isn't </u></em>true. Ria Olberson <em><u>of</u></em> Alabaster University <em><u>says</u></em>, "Few Americans <em><u>lack</u></em> a license. Even <em><u>an</u></em> expired or revoked license <em><u>counts as photo identification.</u></em> The<em><u> idea</u></em> that requiring <em><u>identification disenfranchises some Americans is </u></em>simply <em><u>false</u></em> " (page 101). Just just wrong! <em><u>Many people don't have licenses because they</u></em> don't need or <em><u>desire</u></em> them. Consider <em><u>city dwellers</u></em>. They <em><u>don't need</u></em> licenses: public transportation. <em><u>Many</u></em> of <em><u>these</u></em> people would <em><u>have</u></em> to <em><u>get</u></em> licenses in <em><u>order to participate in a process</u></em> <em><u>that they are entitled </u></em>to<em> </em>as <em><u>U.S.</u></em> citizens.
