Answer:
The total value created is $70
Explanation:
In this scenario, the total value created is the total monetary benefit of a consumer and a producer with respect to the sale of a product. It therefore, is the sum of the consumer surplus and producer surplus. It is calculated as follows:
Consumer surplus = consumer's willing price - market price = 130 - 100 = $30
Producer surplus = market price - producer's willing price = 100 - 60 = $40
Therefore, total value created = 40 + 30 = $70
They are given additional regulatory oversight by CDC BECAUSE THE ITEMS POSE A SEVERE THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.
Because of the high threat that the items pose to the society's health, regulations have to be put in place to control their transportation and use in order to protect the safety and health of humans, animals and plants and plant products.
Original Source Material
Student Version
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Several factors can contribute to long-term organizational success. One is the establishment of a core ideology that Collins and Porras (2002) describe as "core values and sense of purpose beyond just making money" (p. 48). Also, the importance of a visionary leader that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time is hard to over emphasize.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
This is not plagiarism.
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Plagiarism in very simple words is the copying of the content of the document that has been written by some one else in to your own document. During this copying the due acknowledgement is also not given to the document from which it has been taken.
The document that has been talked about in the question above is not an example of plagiarism. The proof for this is the due acknowledgement given to the references from whose document the content has been taken into the document.
Answer: B. provides more social benefits than it derives in private benefits.
Explanation:
Raven farms in this instance is deriving less private benefits than it gives social benefits.
Private benefits are those benefits that the producer gains as a result of their actions.
Social benefits on the other hand are the benefits gained by the producer as well as the benefits to society as well.
Raven's private benefits are the revenue it accrues from it's skin healing cream and yet those same bees still providing a societal service of pollinating Oakcreek Apple Orchard Apple. That shows that they are giving more social benefits than they are receiving.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR).
Explanation:
The Integrated Program Management Report (<em>IPMR</em>) is a legally authorized report containing performance details extracted from the internal Earned Value Management System of the contractor. The IPMR provides an extract on the advance of the agreement including potential problems, costs, and change in schedules.
