The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "<span>-Rainsford did not smile. "I am still a beast at bay," he said, in a low, hoarse voice. "Get ready, General Zaroff." The </span>detail from the excerpt best supports his idea that Rainsford is unchanged and still feels that the hunter is justified in killing the hunted is that <span>-Rainsford did not smile. "I am still a beast at bay," he said, in a low, hoarse voice. "Get ready, General Zaroff." </span>
... of dialogue in a narrative essay? To provide a logical structure for the essay to develop… ... It would be. To develop Characters by displaying their interactions.
Answer:
Personification
Explanation:
This is a type of personification. Personification is like a figure of the speech in which the non-living things are present as living things such as human beings. This is an art in which non-human things are present as living things. Personification is the quality that presents the qualities, feelings, emotions, and sensation and the gestures with the help of metaphor.
Thus here the lines such as where far remote/ the moonbeam gloats carry a personification in its meaning.
Defining unfamiliar English and Spanish words
Since this poem contains words from two different languages, it's important, for the reader to fully understand its meaning, to make sure unfamiliar words in each language are defined. For example, knowing that 'el olvido' means "oblivion" can give a reader better insight into the meaning of the poem.
“If you don’t help them, they will be destroyed.” That makes the most sense for a moral dilema.
