Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
<span>1) propaganda in the newspapers declaring the war as holy and completely just
2) </span><span>the declaration of war
3) </span><span>George’s misgivings about a holy war that promotes the killing of innocent and unknown people
4) </span><span>Editha’s idealistic devotion to the war
5) </span><span>Editha’s letter
6) </span><span>Editha’s satisfaction in her actions
7) </span><span>George’s death
8) </span><span>Mrs. Gearson’s rebuke to Editha</span>
Answer:
I find that pathos is typically the most effective, seconded by logos, with ethos in last place.
Explanation:
Many people use sob stories and the like to great effect, while, in many cases, those who use ethos are shut down by others who are certain in their belief that they know better. Logos is in between of this. Honestly, it depends on who you are talking too. Just remember, many humans are ruled by their emotional centers, and not their logical ones.
Answer:
A The narrator thinks less of her mother because she is too rigid and does not take risks.
Explanation:
In "Safety in Numbers" we are presented the mother of the narrator who is a Chinese woman established in America and extremely strict with her daughter's studies, besides being an extremely cautious person and committed to not taking any risks.
The narrator thinks that the life that her mother stipulated and that imposes on all family members is a mediocre life, especially when she discovers that her mother was a great activist who fought against the Chinese government and took a great risk of life. .
In short, the narrator believes that her mother's life has become small because she is very strict and is not at risk.
Answer:
academic language
an objective, formal tone
a variety of sentence typestion:
