Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
1.) The answer is yes because although it was hers, once an article is published, you cannot republish (or sell) it with another company, it is a form of plagiarism
2.) It would be A because it is correctly cited.
3.) No because he is citing and adding attributions to his work
4.)Yes because even though he made his own version, he still copied the info with out citing or researching other sources
Answer: Fabio's attitude changed because he'd be in the parade.
Explanation: Fabio is excited to be able to participate in the parade. The focus of the question isn't on why he'd be in the parade or how? But on what makes his attitude change. Every other factor mentioned corroborates that he'd be participating in the parade.
Twain uses irony and sarcasm to characterize the king and duke in such a way that communicates his belief that pretending to be something you are not (for the sake of appearances) is both ridiculous and embarrassing.
The literary figure who said that the character of Jim is one of the best portraits of a slave was Langston Hughes. Langston Hughes is a African-American poet, activist, and writer who writes with his works about the negro community and the slaves of America in general.
