I think it's meteor strikes, climate change and widespread volcanic activity.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
Not all. They are not common to both.
Judeo Christian's belief
An immortal soul
An afterlife for souls
One God
God is subject to fate or destiny
The world is a living thing, with body and soul
The earth began out of darkness and nothingness.
The God who creates the earth remains the ruler of all.
A great flood destroys most of humankind
A man builds an ark and is saved from the flood.
Greco Roman
God is void of nothingness.
What is common to both Judeo Christian and Greco Roman is
Concept of a Supreme Law or Ultimate Reality
Explanation:
Greco Roman and Judeo Christian religion differ from each other base on their belief. The Judeo Christian believed that only one God is the controller and ruled the universe while Greco Roman believe and accepts more than one god. They belief in many gods and one prayed and sacrifice to many gods. Though both religion beloved in supreme law but Judeo Christian believed in God's law and Greco Roman beloved in human written law.
God is a void of nothingness is not common to both. The Judeo Christian belief God is not empty, He is very much alive and full of alot of things.
The correct answers are:
- Wage/salary;
- Active job seekers;
The amount of money you earn by working is your wage or salary. The difference being that the wage represents the money you get paid on hourly, weekly, or monthly basis, while the salary is what you earn in year. The wages/salaries vary a lot, some being very high, some being modest, some very high, depending on the type of job, type of economy, as well as the qualifications of the worker.
The percentage of people that are actively looking for job is called active job seekers. The active job seekers can be people that are unemployed, but also people that re employed but want to work something or somewhere else. While some people struggle to find jobs and would accept almost anything, other people want to constantly progress, thus they are not satisfying with a job where they do not progress, so they seek for new challenges and opportunities.
Answer and Explanation:
Jacob Mchangama and Guglielmo Verdirame, in their article “The Danger of Human Rights Proliferation,” defend liberty by the motto of “less are more.”
We are asserting more and more rights without checking out the implementation of previous rights. Asserting more rights and convincing the states to add them in treaties would not lead to more excellent protection of human rights.
The proliferation of rights is more harmful to humans because human rights are not protected fully as we are expanding the number of rights in treaties.
They argued that: “If human rights were a currency, its value would be free fall……..this currency is buy cover for dictatorships ”
Rights of human language have been used to restrict rights. Freedom of religion and expression was a foundation of human rights, but states also restricted those rights in the name of human rights.
To sum up, the proliferation of human rights does not ensure that the rights of humans are being secured. States are not always concerned directly with the welfare of humans but to restrict those rights more. So the proliferation of rights is not fruitful but a dangerous thing.
It seems like that the answer is located right after the question
What was the "car culture" of the 1950s? is the question and the info after is the answer.
