Answer:
Q 2. First, it would be necessary to listen to the boy's parents and listen to the boy's explanations of why he is acting this way. Once I knew both sides of the story, I could better assess the situation and establish a dialogue between parents and children so that both could speak their complaints and talk about how they can change this situation.
Q 3. My daily private victory is carried out with the following activities: 1. Organizing my day's tasks so that I know exactly what I should do, 2. Do not put off my obligations and do them at the right times, 3. Remember to put moments of rest in order not to be overwhelmed, 4. Only start an activity when I finish the one that has already started, 5. Do not compare the quality of my activities with the quality of other people's activities, 6. Be kind to my limitations. The time that these activities take to complete is very relative and I don't care about it, but I do care about performing my duties efficiently so that I can feel the sense of victory. The activities that are excluded from the daily private victory are those that prohibit an individual from being proactive, cause the individual to start acting without having a goal as the desired end and activities that disorganize and do not establish what must be done first.
Explanation:
In the case shown in Q 2. it shows a situation that must be evaluated carefully and must take into account how the parents and the boy feel and what makes them act the way they do. Only communication between them can resolve this situation. It is important for the boy to explain why he is acting this way, how important it is for his parents to listen to him without judgment and for everyone to accept and try to change his mistakes.
Q 3. talks about “Daily Private Victory”, which are victories that bring personal satisfaction to an individual. This satisfaction need not be resilient to great things, but small situations that happen in the individual's life and allow him to be satisfied with himself and the environment around him.
Answer:In a five-paragraph literary analysis essay, explain how each author develops the common theme. Compare and contrast how the authors develop this theme by referencing specific literary devices and techniques in your response. Thesis: Cisneros's and Otika's stories reveal that America is made up of a blend of cultures as well as its own.Cultural identity has to do with who you, as an individual person, are. Different foods, traditions, clothing, and language can contribute to one's cultural identity. However, some may interpret cultural identity differently. Americans get their cultural identity from many cultures and add their own. Cisneros's"Mericans" and "Otika's Response to Executive Order 9066" reveal that America is made up of a blend of cultures as well as its own.Otika shows how she interprets her own cultural identity and how others identify her. She uses an anecdote to convey her theme. In February 1942, the US President signed Executive order 9066, affectingmany Japanese people in America.
Explanation:
1. Veracity and construction are important factors in evaluating an argument. Well-constructed arguments are clear, simple and straightforward, allowing a quick understanding and understanding of the spoken subject. Veracity is also essential, because it shows that the argument is true and that it is passing on correct information.
2. These factors are important because they allow the construction of a coherent, respectful, intriguing and cohesive debate. This is because a debate with well-constructed and true arguments, is capable of demonstrating various facets of a topic efficiently and thoroughly.
3. Deductive arguments are those that contain enough information for a conclusion on a given topic to be created, inductive arguments, on the other hand, do not promote the creation of a conclusion, but provide information that provides the basis and the necessary grounds for there to be a deduction and valid reasoning.
4. In order to answer the fourth question, it would be necessary to know the activities and concepts that you have studied, but you can answer that question by highlighting the activity or concept that best matched your personality and beliefs. Then you can explain that the concepts and activities that you did not highlight are concepts that are complicated for your understanding, or that do not match your personal values on some points.
