The answer is A direct characterization because they are describing it
In this case, the main sentence has an embedded clause at the end:
"<em>I think </em><em>that ’twixt the negroes of the South and the women at the North, all talking about rights, the white men will be in a fix pretty soon</em><em>.</em>" (embedded clause in bold.)
This embedded sentence is <u>complex</u> as it has one independent clause ("<em>...the white men will be in a fix pretty soon.</em>") and a dependent clause ("<em>...that 'twixt the negroes of the South and the women at the North...</em>")
The main sentence presents a simple syntactic pattern: S.V.O. (Subject-Verb-Object), as it contains a mono-transitive verb ("<em>think</em>") which requires a direct object following it ("<em>that...</em>"). The subject of the sentence is the personal pronoun "<em>I</em>". This S.V.O. pattern is present in sentences much simpler, such as "<em>I think this</em>" or "<em>I like that.</em>"
Your answer would be, What we can infer about Ivan Jakovlevitch, from his reaction in the passage from " THE Nose" is that he is often blamed for things, which isn't his fault.
hope that helps!!!! ( From his reaction in the passage, "The Nose", we can infer that; He's often blamed for things, which isn't his fault.).
Hope that helps!!!!
Answer:
It would either be "speaker" or "listener"
or
"Receiver" or "sender"
Explanation:
it depends on if you're speaking verbally or speaking virtually
