Answer:
Answer 1.
Beneath referenced pointers show that organization arranged the liquidation for recent years or something like that.
- The way that there had been no interest in R&D for recent years which more likely than not brought about noteworthy cost putting something aside for the organization.
- BBB bought expanded size of stock on layaway from providers in recent years which is a warning.
- Indeed, even without bringing about any R&D cost for recent years, CFO of BBB moved toward the bank to expand the credit line of the organization and utilized all credit line without legitimate desk work.
- CFO erroneously guaranteed the brokers about new product offering so as to look for advances/increment credit line.
- Indeed, even with diminished deals, organization was indicating lower supply of stock. They more likely than not been offering the stock at cost to outsider or shrouded it at an undisclosed area to dupe the providers.
- With no interest in R&D and declining business possibilities, organization couldn't have given new offers for subsidizing
Answer 2.
Yes, even if it is a fraudulent filing for bankruptcy, BBB organization despite everything can select to petition for financial protection or BBB can close the business through and through and escape with the reserve funds and continues from the offer of the stock. Indeed, even leasers and providers reserve the option to petition for automatic insolvency against the BBB in the event that BBB doesn't seek financial protection.
It thoroughly relies upon the BBB Company, in the event that it selects to declare financial insolvency under section 7, or 11 of the liquidation code. Be that as it may, it is just under section 11 liquidation procedures of the chapter 11 court it very well may be set up that BBB's aim and untrustworthy strategic policies establishes to insolvency misrepresentation.
Answer:
Z-Mart purchased $3,000 worth of merchandise on credit. Transportation costs were an additional $100, paid cash to the cartage company on delivery. Z-Mart returned $300 worth of merchandise and paid the invoice on time, and took a 2% purchase discount. The amount of this payment was <u>$2744</u>
Explanation:
Purchases excluding freight $3,000
Less:Goods returned -$300
Add:freight charges $100
Net Purchases $2,800
Less:Discount on payment($2,800*2%) -$56
Net cash paid $2,844
Answer:
The correct answer is <em>d. Canada requires fewer resources than the U.S. to produce a bushel of wheat.</em>
Explanation:
A country (in this case Canada) has a comparative advantage over another country (in this case the United States) to produce a certain product (in this case wheat) if the production costs of that product (wheat) are less than from the other country, regardless of the opportunity cost of producing that other product in that country.
The comparative advantage is based on the fact that the country has developed greater efficiency in the use of resources or that it has greater ease of access to them due to better conditions of nature, greater technological development in the field in question, human capital more specialized in that economic field, etc.
The opportunity cost of producing a product or another in the same country does not affect a deterioration or increase of the comparative advantage developed to produce such a product.
The ‘SMART’ technique a tool for effective goal setting. The acronym SMART stands for Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bound, all of which are requisites for goals. The goal “to sell a combination of six refrigerators, stoves or dishwashers to earn a bonus” is specific, measurable, attainable and realistic because Michelle has done this before. Yet the goal is not time-bound. The length of time it is required to meet is not specified in the goal.
