The three components of a scientific argument are:
1- THE CLAIM
The claim is a conclusion achieved that answers the original question.
2- THE EVIDENCE
The evidence is used to support the claim. It has to be sufficient, correct qualitative, quantitative and appropiate.
3- THE REASONING
The reasoning is the part that links the claim with the evidence, showing why the data correctly supports the claim made at the begining of the process.
Answer:
can leave
Explanation:
This makes the most sense.
Hope this helps plz hit the crown :D
Answer:
C.his feelings of contempt and animosity toward Snowball and his ideas
The excerpt says that he "declared himself against the windmill" and while walking around the plans "snuffed at them once or twice". This behavior shows that he is not in favor of the windmill plans. His act of urinating all over the plans confirms his dislike of them.
The other options are also simply wrong. Option A is simply an incorrect statement. The hens and ducks did not make the plans nor did they have plans to destroy them. His natural instinct to mark the plans as his own is also a terrible choice. Option D is also not a good option since the other animals have already seen Snowball's windmill plans. We know this because it says "All of them came to look".
Explanation:
<span>"Leave my loneliness unbroken! quit the bust above my door!
Take thy beak from out my heart, and take thy form from off my door!"
shows that the speaker is in a great amount of grief and wants to be left in it, without being disturbed and the disturbances are frustrating him.</span>
HeyThere,
@Andychulo1073
The statement that best describes how the two adaptations of Hamlet differ is A. Price’s Hamlet is carefree and unaffected by the ghost’s appearance.
Let me know if you have any further questions or concerns.
Best,
MythicalPanda
