Answer:
1) Bruchac is part American Indian and part European 2) "two Slovak children who became my grandparents" 3) "only one part of my blood loves that memory" 4) He can see two perspectives on what the promise of America meant for different people.
Explanation:
"The situation made me think," can lead you into the conclusion that the answer your looking for is in that sentence. Usually when reflecting you can say, "I thought back to," or "I thought about". Also, it leads into the concluding sentence about how judging others is wrong, so it's the reflection before a decision.
TDLR; the answer is, "The situation made me think about how I..."
Hope this helps!!
Answer:
Olivia <u>enjoys</u> the attention she received however she knows that she <u>cannot accept the trophy</u> because it would be <u>dishonest</u>
Explanation:
It says in the story that while she likes the attention shes getting from the rest of the high school because Olivia is the shy one and as the story says "flies under the radar" but even though Olivia likes the attention, she cant accept the trophy as that would make her feel bad and that would be dishonest of her to take somebody's else's trophy and take the credit.
The views of the narrators similar in "Facing It" and "Not a Dove, But No Longer a Hawk" when both narrators discuss the negative impact of war on the innocent civilians.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
While the writer of Facing It is Yusef Kounyaa, a Vietnamese poet and the writer of Not a Dove, But No Longer a Hawk is Neil Sheehan. Both of them have a common theme- the Vietnam War. While Yusef Kounyaa, a Vietnamese who has returned from USA has written in his perspective.
In facing it poem, writer explores some different angles of Vietnam War. This says the readers about the war consequences and its changes on people lives.
Neil Sheehan, an American journalist who covered the Vietnam War, has written is from his perspective. i.e. his experience view in war end up. Finally, states that citizen of Vietnam not at all supported as only destruction happened to them.
Answer:
Question 1: The central idea from the paragraph that is a reason that supports the claim “cheating exists because of incentive.” is Ranking is everything.
Question 2: The three sentences that present evidence to support the idea that “Ranking is everything.” are:
* “Each wrestler maintains a ranking that affects every slice of his life.”
* “The seventieth-ranked wrestler in Japan, meanwhile, earns only $15,000 a year.”
* “Low-ranked wrestlers must tend to their superiors.”
Explanation:
It is described in the paragraph that in Japan the ranking as a sumo fighter is extremely important since the rank that each wrestler achieves will determine either if they are meant to be served or to serve since Japan has a culture that goes around honor this is considered an important factor that leads competitors to cheat it goes beyond money.
