answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Neko [114]
2 years ago
14

In at least 100 words, discuss the explicit and implicit meanings in the above excerpt. Be sure and point out the differences be

tween the two types of meaning and quote the text that supports your explanation.
History
1 answer:
Aliun [14]2 years ago
5 0
Explicit: Stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt. the closing words of a text, manuscript, early printed book, or chanted liturgical text. For example: "the speaker's intentions were not made explicit.
Implicit: Implied though not plainly expressed. With no qualification or question; absolute. Not expressed directly in terms of independent variables. These two words have almost opposite meanings but are regularly confused because of their similar sound. Since they do have such different meanings, you want to be sure that you're using the right one. Keep this in mind: Implicit is indirect; and Explicit is direct.  Here is something that might help you to remember the difference in both these words. Remember this and you won't ever fall short when thinking, "Is it Implicit or Explicit?" A good way to keep explicit vs implicit apart is to remember that Iimplicit is an Implied or Indirect statement. Both of these start with the letter "I". Explicit starts with an "E" and is spelled out, so there is no confusion. Implicit and Explicit have near opposite meanings, so it's important to remember their difference. Implicit is indirectly stated or implied. Explicit is directly stated and spelled out. 

I hope this helps and sorry I went over 100 I checked and its 200 words!!!!
You might be interested in
If you had been a delegate to one of the state conventions, would you have sided with the Federalists, or the Anti-Federalists?
LenKa [72]
This is a very subjective question and can only be answered by you, but keep in mind that in general, the Federalists wanted a stronger federal government, while the Anti-Federalists wanted a weak central government and lots of state power. Hope that helps. 
8 0
2 years ago
Read 3 more answers
Complete the activity titled "Changing Borders: The Growth and Decline of the Soviet Union." Describe the growth of the Soviet U
vfiekz [6]

The USSR was formed in the year 1922 which was a union of multiple soviet republics.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The USSR which was union of soviet socialist republic was formed in the year 1922. It was a union of the soviet republics which united Russia, Ukrainian, Belorussian and Transcaucasia. The government and the economy was highly centralized. It was governed by the communist party. All this also saw rapid industrialization and the period of growth and development.

But there were also a number of tragedies and disasters like there was great drought and famine in the period of 1932-33. This led to many dying without food and millions of deaths happened.

6 0
2 years ago
The text describes the way that immigrants from India have established their own cultural norms within New York City. The way th
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

 situational negotiation of identity.

Explanation:

This is an example of  situational negotiation of identity.  

situational negotiation of identity is where one ethnic identity is used in one context and other ethnic identity is used in another context. An ethnic group shares similar values and norms defined by such things as language, religion, geography, caste, etc. Indian community is living and celebrating Indian culture and values along with Fellow Indians in New York. This is an example of  situational negotiation of identity.  

5 0
2 years ago
Which statement best illustrates General Andrew Jackson’s attitude toward the American Indians? He interfered in the Creek civil
Natasha_Volkova [10]
Pres. Jackson wanted peace with the Native Americans and tried to keep any skirmishes or fights from starting.
8 0
2 years ago
The BIGGEST negative side effect of Georgia's production of cotton in the 1800s was that
Likurg_2 [28]
Your Answer is D over-production led to the soil becoming depleted of nutrients 
this was one cause of the great dust bowl
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What role did U.S. security forces play in Vietnam during the Kennedy administration? (5 points) A. Combat troops fought the Vie
    11·1 answer
  • At the end of World War I, which of the following caused the greatest damage to President Wilson’s legacy?
    12·2 answers
  • Even though Reaganomics worked for the most part, what two things caused the Federal deficit to soar? bailing out savings and lo
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments? All three amendments granted voting rights
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not true about the comparison of feudal European serfs and feudal Japanese peasants? (1 point)
    13·2 answers
  • When would the government most likely decrease its spending?
    12·2 answers
  • What activity did young women attend in medieval Europe? horseracing boxing matches the circus jousting tournaments
    12·2 answers
  • 30 points will mark as brainliest Read the section, "Baghdad: 8th century." What did the book a Thousand and One Nights tell of?
    10·1 answer
  • In the second stanza, Kipling lists some “positives” that colonization might bring. What are they?
    5·1 answer
  • Which part of the roman empire did not have christian areas by 476?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!