answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashcka [7]
2 years ago
5

If you had been a delegate to one of the state conventions, would you have sided with the Federalists, or the Anti-Federalists?

Use what you know about each group to support your own point of view and opinion.
History
3 answers:
LenKa [72]2 years ago
8 0
This is a very subjective question and can only be answered by you, but keep in mind that in general, the Federalists wanted a stronger federal government, while the Anti-Federalists wanted a weak central government and lots of state power. Hope that helps. 
ozzi2 years ago
6 0

Here is information to support either side:

Federalists - Federalists were individuals who believed that the United States needed the federal government to have more power than the state government. One of the major reason behind this idea is the lack of success underneath the Articles of Confederation. This was America's first constitution and it was highly ineffective. This was ineffective due to the lack of power held by the federal government.

Anti-Federalists- Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, felt that state governments should have more power than federal government. Anti-Federalists feared that a strong federal govenrment would infringe upon the rights of its citizens.

Guest1 year ago
0 0

I would have sided with the Federalists because Federalists wanted a strong federal government mean while the Anti-Federalists wanted a weak government and lots of state power even though it would help the people with small places. Without a strong government the state would be stable in any area, the government helps by providing leadership, maintaining order, providing public services, providing national security, providing economic security, and providing economic assistance and more!

Try this!I got an 100 so I hope this helps you :))

You might be interested in
"a great democracy has got to be progressive or it will soon cease to be great or a democracy." Can u explain the meaning of thi
den301095 [7]

a great democracy has got to be progressive or it will soon cease to be great or a democracy.


Ideally, the foundations of democracy should be derived from the people. The people--as a collective entity--is always changing. That's in a general sense. America as a full fledged democracy is arguable just because we elect representatives to choose further up the food chain. On the other hand, that can be considered democracy in play in itself.

An example of progress in democracy, formerly marginalized people would add into the collective people.

The more input, the greater the people beneifited, the more impact, the greater the society.

5 0
2 years ago
Is Madison's opinion of the role of self-interest in the conduct of one's life realistic? Why or why not?
Lera25 [3.4K]
<span>Answer: Madison's major idea on this, expressed in such places as the Federalist Papers was that self-interest could be used to ensure liberty and justice. He argued that people were going to act in their own interests. What was needed was a government that was set up to make sure that those "selfish" actions actually helped.</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Whose idea was Dr. Rizal responding to? What exactly was the notion held about Filipinos during Rizal’s time?
Nikolay [14]

Answer:

Indolence

Explanation:

La Indolencia de los Filipinos, popularly known as "The Indolence of the Filipinos," in its English version. It is an exploratory essay which was written by Philippine national hero Dr. Jose Rizal. It explained the alleged idleness or indolence of his people during the Spanish colonization.

Dr. Rizal admits the indolence with the people of Filipinos, but he says that the indolence in the people are the causes to different factors like the climate, hot sun and some social disorders as a result of the Spanish government.

8 0
2 years ago
In five to seven sentences, summarize your understanding of how the United States is changing in late 1900s to early 2000s.
Zepler [3.9K]
Your response to this question must include:

aging population
immigration patterns
growing diversity
migration patterns<span>
family structure

As long as you include these point your answer will be correct.</span>
0 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
vazorg [7]

Answer: 1)medicine 2)physics 3)astronomy 4)Aristotle

Explanation: According to the second paragraph, members of the Royal Society discussed MEDICINE, PHYSICS and ASTRONOMY. According to the fourth paragraph, members didn’t want to eliminate the works of ARISTOTLE, but instead wanted to build on them.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following describes slavery in Songhai?
    13·2 answers
  • What is 0.00147 In standard form
    7·2 answers
  • Read this excerpt from The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone by James Cross Giblin.
    11·2 answers
  • In which region of the country did the northern forces have the most success
    10·2 answers
  • Write two-three sentences explaining whether this document could be used to support Washington’s account.
    8·2 answers
  • Explain how whale oil affected human freedom?
    15·1 answer
  • What did the three membersof the axis powers have in common
    10·1 answer
  • Napoleon introduced many reforms in France to boost its development. He improved the education system by creating lycées. The pu
    8·2 answers
  • Why were priests and nuns among the early settlers in Texas?
    6·1 answer
  • Using document 1, explain the geographic context of the developments shown on the<br> map.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!