Answer:
The only time I believe it should be permissible for the rights of an individual to infringe on the rights of a group is when that group is doing any kind of wrongdoing such as harming another person, or a person's happiness or property. You shouldn't have any right to affect another's group rights or decision unless it causes harm or indirect harm.
Explanation:
<span>"The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist" is an indefensible claim. The others can be proven or at least debated over because at some point in time all of them have true and false. For instance, the majority of congress and the President have been from the same political party. Also, the majority of congress and the President have NOT been from the same political party. Therefore, you can compare the difference between true and false. Political boundaries have always existed. As a result, you cannot comfortably compare it to anything else.</span>
Martin Puryear’s work C.F.A.O, invites the viewer to consider the history of colonized Africans by peering through a <u>Wheelbarrow.</u>
“The Conscience of a Conservative” is actually a book that was written by <span>Barry Goldwater. This book covers the subject of Politics since Barry Goldwater was a presidential candidate. This book focuses on how to acquire maximum freedom by individuals and this was released before he ran as a presidential candidate. That time, this book achieved high praise from liberals. The answer for this is option A.</span>
