Answers:
<u>Adam Smith
</u>
- Competition is a regulatory force.
<u>Friedrich von Hayek
</u>
- Less government intervention gives people more economic freedom.
<u>Milton Friedman</u>
- Government should not control the money supply.
<u>John Maynard Keynes
</u>
-
Government intervention is necessary for stability.
Explanation:
Adam Smith's landmark work on <em>The Wealth of Nations </em>(1776) argued against government control of commerce and advocated for competition between business as a self-regulating sort of force.
Friedrich von Hayek's 1944 book <em>The Road to Serfdom </em>was an influential work of classical liberalisn in economics (what today we'd more likely call libertarianism).
Milton Friedmen was skeptical about the value of the Federal Reserve controlling the money supply.<em> Capitalism and Freedom </em>is a collection of his influential essays, published in 1962.
John Maynard Keynes proposed that increasing government expenditures and lowering taxes would stimulate demand and pull the economy out of a state of depression. His approach was adopted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal program, which sought to bring the United States out of the Great Depression.
Several changes have occurred to the Heritage Day, First, the change of name from Shaka Day to Heritage Day and now National Braai Day.
Heritage Day is an important public holiday in South African culture. Hence it encourages different beliefs and tradition while appreciating the various languages of South African People.
<span>Credible, because a historian student could have some idea on different topics, and then discover new information that eventually led the student to rethink their ideas. In particular, the sentence is credible because it is possible to admire several pieces in the British Museum related to Julio Ceasar.
---
Biased. The sentence, while could be absolutely written by a historical scholar, should not be included in an article, unless the article is an essay where the scholar expresses an opinion, and even then it should be justified and not simply stated as it appears here.
---
Biased. The sentence seems more probable to be said during a personal conversation of some sort, considering the personal tone of the statement, and the fact that is made considering only the speaker's viewpoint without any evidence to support the claim.
---
Credible. While the sentence sure is not the best from an academic viewpoint, in a blog it is not usual to use a form of expression that is less codified than what is used in scholars papers. Moreover, it is credible that a historical blogger could want to engage its readers in that way, thus making the statement credible.</span>
Answer:
the play would change because their is no males in there only female
Explanation:
