Answer:
E. suggests that the speaker's vocabulary is limited
Explanation:
The question above is related to the poem entitled "Sestina: Like," written by A.E. Stallings. It is a fixed verse type of poem which consists of<em> six stanzas.</em> Every stanza has<u> six lines. </u>
The repetition of versions of the word "like" at the end of the lines allows the poem to focus on its subject matter. This allows the central concept of the poem to be unified. It also shows that the poet used the word "like" as a play on words because it provides "humor" to what is happening in the society today.
So, this concludes that <u>using the word "like" doesn't mean the poet has a limited vocabulary.</u>
Thus, this explains the answer.
You take 800 times 22% so .22 and you get 176 move the decimal over one place and get 17.6$
Answer:
C) Crowdsourcing requires private information to be publicly shared with competitors.
Explanation:
Crowd sourcing is a tool that involves different parties to carry out one task. As much beneficial it is in terms of collecting data efficiently and broadening the vision, it also exposes the company towards various risks.
In order to outsource, specific data is to be let out which makes the company vulnerable. That data can be misused easily and instead of help, the company could go down in flames.
<span>Measuring Productivity Levels. Recall that operations management is responsible for managing the transformation of numerous inputs into a range of outputs, such as goods or services.
So the answer is C.
Hope this helps.
</span>
Answer:
Part A:
The cofounding variable is a factor that could cause a result on the experiment. This would be the people taking extra food.
Independent variable would be being asked to sign in or not and take free food, because independent variable is a variable that is changed or manipulated and in this case the people were split in half and the hypothesis is that the people who didn't sign in would take more food.
Operational definitions are important when conducting research because it defines all the variables in the experiment, so it can be replicated. The operational def for the dependent variable would be "Doing the right thing even though you aren't being watched"
Part B:
The data does not support the hypothesis because even the people who signed in could've taken extra food when the dean wasn't looking. The findings cannot be generalized to all students because some students could have been taught better and can differentiate between right and wrong. So the people who were not signed in could've just taken one burger and drink, and the people who were signed in might feel obligated to take more than one burger because they had signed in and didn't just come without signing in.
The study is not a naturalistic observation because the observer did not look at the people who took the food and which side took more food.
