C a tendency toward manipulating others for personal gain
Please vote for Brainliest :) :) :) :)
Though Buck is not a husky himself, does he take on any of their qualities? Using Jack London’s descriptions from his essay “Husky: Wolf-Dog of the North,” complete this prompt analyzing the shared traits between Buck and his wild counterparts, and how Buck is influenced by his new setting and surroundings. What do these shared traits tell you about some of the larger themes and ideas in London’s body of work? Your prompt should draw on a number of different quotations and examples (evidence) from both “Husky” and The Call of the Wild<span> to support your analysis.
Please mark me as brainliest.</span>
Answer:
According to Douglass, laws in the south prove that slaves are human beings in those laws passed in the south punish slaves as punish white men. Douglass used the reference of the laws passed in the southern state of Virginia.
Explanation:
<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>
Answer:
It could be repetition.
Explanation:
It repeats the word O Blues!
That is my best guess
