Answer:
1:a 2:d 3:a 4:b 5:b 6:c 7:c
Answer:
Explanation: Here, it is possibly debatable as the decision would depend and differ due to the various factors like the past records of the applicant prior to the crime, sense of realization, his evolution after the crime etc. If they are refused to be hired everywhere it may lead to the destruction of not merely their future and career but may also result in their falling into depression and leading to committing of another crime.<em> If they are given jobs then there too there are equal chances of turning them into model employees in order to nullify the effects of their previous criminal acts or getting back to their previous criminal nature and commission of another crime.</em> It is quite a situation of dilemma which could be solved by using the personal history of the candidate prior to hiring and even after that it is essential to keep a check onto his/her activities at the workplace.
Leaphorn does not trust O'Malley
According to Laphron, O'Malley possess the character that is had by typical Federal agencies' employees, acting only like a loyal servant for the big man upstairs.
But Lephron does not let his opinion to intervene with the quality in any of his works, but he seems to can't be fully truthful to O'Malley
Answer:
1.) A REASON SUPPORTED WITH EVIDENCE
2.)FOUND EVIDENCE
3.)PRESENT
4.)However, the risks outweigh the benefits.
It acts in its own interests, not the people's interests. And this is a fundamental elemental that has to exist within a democratic republic, according to Madison. It is necessary to tolerate those that have other ideas and who are acting in their own self interest, but hopefully the democratic process will diminish or decrease the effect of extreme wants of a faction.
