When large numbers of voters are involved in the choice of representatives it is better for the republic hope this helps
Answer:
Michel:<u>"Jane poured coffee on herself!"</u>
Jane:"I Simply spilled, Michel"
Michel:"But it was a spill. Dad, are you listening? <u>Jane spilled on herself!</u>"
Jane, rolling her eyes: "Michel <u>you've spilled over yourself </u>plenty of times. Now shush."
Explanation:
The ones underlined are the Reflexive Pronouns. Hope you like it!
I would think that this means that every one is effected differently or impacted in a different way.Here is an example some people are scared of the dark and think that there is evil within the dark and some people are like ehhh the lights are just off ope this helped :)
A foil is the near complete opposite of the main character (whichever character they want you to find a foil for).
Rainsford and Whitney were good hunting friends with numerous similar interests. They could not be foils because of how close in similarity they were. Even when they disagreed on how animals felt about being hunted, Whitney seemed open to and intrigued by Rainsford's points and way of thinking.
Ivan is a near irrelevant character, being a mere Cossack who follows whatever General Zaroff says. He is mindless and has almost zero traits to even compare to Rainsford, let alone any traits aside from a mindless follower to begin with.
The answer would be General Zaroff. This is almost like the cliche protagonist vs antagonist foil. Both of them are hunters, but different kinds. Zaroff got bored with animals and wanted to hunt human people instead, whereas Rainsford had enjoyed the thrill of an animal hunt and thinks that the hunting of people is murder. Zaroff is more heartless and cold, a killer, if you will. Rainsford seems to think highly of actual people, and had no interest in playing Zaroff's game.
Answer:
Bone or metal pencil is the correct answer.
Explanation:
