Since the very beginning of the sentence, the phrase <em>last night</em> indicates that the action in the sentence was performed in the past. In other words, the action described in the sentence has already happened. For this reason, the verb that completes the sentence with the appropiate verb tense has to be a verb in past tense. Thus, the correct answer is revised, which is the only verb from the list that is in past tense.
Evidence should be your answer
Incomplete question. I referred to a similar situation.
Answer:
<u>D. a central character whose trustworthiness the reader is invited to doubt</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
We can make such a conclusion because <em>the narrator</em> in the passage isn't speaking from the point of view who knows about the community's history and practices. But is open to doubts from his readers.
Muir starts off talking about how long he had been sitting by the Calypso-so long that he wasn't tired or hungry anymore. We, as the readers, think he has a bad attitude about sitting by this plant.We think this because it seems like he is describing his wait as painful(he is WAY past being tired or hungry). However, the next sentence contrasts with this idea. When the sun sets, Muir suddenly gets this jolt of purpose and energy, stronger and determined than ever before. Can you see the pattern here? As for the dialogue, it is a woman speaking, and she lives in the log house he sees. She has a negative attitude towards the swamp, while Muir has a positive one. She wonders why he would want to be in a dangerous place like the swamp, explaining that a body was found in it. She then goes on to say that it was God's mercy that Muir was able to get out of the mucky swamp.I hope this helps!
She could not believe that such a violent (or vile) act would be committed.
