<span>These would be two of the main branches (or disciplines) of geography. The physical branch deals with the actual landforms and seeks to see the study as an actual Earth science. Human geography, in comparison, is a way of looking at the world that tries to understand how cultures and peoples are shaped. This takes into account religion, economics, health, culture, time, politics, and other aspects.</span>
Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
Frame alignment
Explanation:
According to David Snow, Frame alignment is a term in sociology that describes a connection between the individual and social movement organization's interpretive orientations, whereby individual interests, values, principles, and Social Movement Organization activities, goals, and ideology are well aligned and complementary.
In other words, Frame Alignment is a situation where the orientations of individuals and a social movement organization connect in a way that there is a complementary set of interests, beliefs, goals, activities, and ideologies in the movement.
Hence, the right answer is FRAME ALIGNMENT
Answer:
Index validation and external validation
Explanation:
External validation is like when a person feels self-pride and improvement when other people appreciate his/her work performances, thought In something they need to show that they are good enough in something.
Index validation is a scientific quality of the research. It implies the quality of the management in the European countries.
Thus professor Swanson compared the index score of the marital happiness and the index validation with the external validation.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the links to the websites are not attached to explore them. However, we can comment on the following.
Two people were key parts of the development of the story of the Watergate Scandal. I am referring to the Washington Post journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.
Both reporters became too interested in the events of June 1972, that kept on investigating and reporting information until they revealed that United States President Richard Nixon had connections with that event, when burglars were arrested bu the police, when they were robbing documents form the Democratic National Committee headquarters, in Washington D.C.
These two brave journalists end up winning the Pulitzer Price in 1973 for their coverage. They documented all their experiences in the best seller books "All the President's Men" and "The Final Days."
That is why I think the life and actions of the two reporters illuminate important aspects of the Watergate scandal.
