Answer:
The Three-Fifths Compromise established that a state’s enslaved population would be counted for partial representation.
Explanation:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement made between delegates during the Constitutional Convention (1787) that established that the number of seats in the House of Representatives for each state should be calculated in accordance to the number of free persons (excluding Indians not taxed) and the three-fifths of slaves in every state. In other words, the Compromise counted three out of every five slaves as people for partial representation. This agreement would increase the power of slave states.
Answer:
Trade Expansion:
✔️A) Industries such as shipping, manufacturing, and banking developed and flourished.
✔️B) Wealth increased, allowing people to sponsor talented artists and scholars.
Crusades:
✔️C) People lost faith in the church and turned their attention from the divine to the human world.
✔️D) Europeans interacted with foreign cultures of the East and became aware of new ideas and experiences.
Explanation:
During the trade expansion, industries were developed and they also flourished. Some of the industries that were greatly impacted are the shipping (because these were the point were goods came from other countries), manufacturing and banking (the growth of banking houses). There was increase in wealth as people made money from the trade.
During the crusades, the church was growing in political power through their militaristism actions. This made people to start doubting the spiritual state of the church. Also, as diseases broke out, the church could not profer solutions to the problems. This led to people "losing faith in the church". At this time too, there was new experiences and ideas people learnt.
It had a negative effect, because it encouraged slavery because people could buy more power in government through the purchase of slaves
Answer:
These similarities suggested that people who supported the Populist Party in the 1890’s were part of small organizations and small farms that were against big businesses.
Explanation: