Well everyone has different point of veiws.so you might find it meaningless while she thinks not of it.for example the women rights movement,men or other women saw it pointless that women should vote or get any of the privileges that men have or get. so lets say you thought that it was cool that the women stood up and fought like that but your friend didn't find it interesting that is different perspectives. correct me if i am wrong.
The reason why this can happen is because of the transformative journey that Jin Wang is on. At first, Jin Wang is ashamed of being Chinese, and wants to appear as white as possible. Wei-Chen is fully Chinese, and because of this, he is a foil, as he is a character that highlights the characteristics of the protagonist by contrasting them with his own, which are the opposite.
However, as the story progresses, Jin Wang becomes even less similar to Wei-Chen, as he kisses Suzy and as he transforms into Danny. Jin Wang, therefore, not only contrasts with Wei-Chen, but is in open opposition to him. This makes Wei-Chen the antagonist.
"My ideal life in 15 years is me and my wife, sitting on the porch of our lake house watching our kids play. In order to reach that goal i can do great in my classes and follow a significant career path."
I do think
<span>There was no deceiving himself: something terrible, new, and more important than anything before in his life, was taking place within him of which he alone was aware
is the answer</span>
In this excerpt, the rhetorical technique that the passage best exemplify is:
A. Parallelism
Parallelism is when there is grammar equilibrium in two or more sentences, we can see such a case in these two sentences: They picked handfuls of daisies. They picked bunches of daffodils. On the one hand, the subject is the same They, and on the other the Tense is also the same.
We find no evidence of exaggeration of any type, nor there is satire or irony.
