Answer:
Bounded rationality
Explanation:
The term bounded rationality was proposed by Herbert Simon to analyze the decision making process of agents in complex systems. In other words, bounded rationality refers to the decision making of an individual based on the limitation of the information needed to make that decision.
Since Evelyn has limited her research on machine screw suppliers to suppliers in her state only, in order to decide which supplier she will contact, we can say that Evelyn is using bounded rationality
.
Answer:
Set target for a statistically significant improvement compared to the current value.
Explanation:
For programs that are innovative, address rare health problems, or are highly tailored to the location a target of value of a statistically significant improvement compared to the current value is set. It is appropriate when there is credible data source and policy makers need to be convinced on an investment that is worthwhile. Also, change can happen anytime and planners must be able to set an argument that greater change will most likely occur by chance alone. The Z-test is used to determine the amount of change that is statistically significant. Very often, the significance level is set at p= 0.05 which implies that the probability of reaching the target by chance alone is 5% or less than 5 in 100 which translates to a Z-score of 1.96 which is used to estimate the target value.
Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
Answer:
Health psychology
Explanation:
Health psychology is a specific area that focused on different areas such as biology, psychology, and sociology. These factors influence the mental illness and health of a person.
The other field such as behavioral medicine and medical psychology both areas work in health psychology. In psychology both health and illness affected by may factors.
But on the other hand, health and hereditary contagious are the common terms used in mental illness. Many of the behavioral and psychological factors that affect the mental illness of a person.
Thus health psychology is the different sub-field of the psychology that affects the psychological factors that contribute to health, illness and the recovery of a person.
Answer:
1. What does the study say about places that had enough population to be considered metropolis?
2. Was the view expicit enough to make a determination on the general population?
3. Could the determination about autism be caused by diverse age group study in places of high relevance?
4. Were the person's studied being selected from explicitly different areas in the metropolis?