Answer:
idk how to answer this cuz I never read "Vincent in England" but I'm guessing D. or A.
The correct answer is C. Overgeneralization.
Explanation
The fallacy of overgeneralization is a type of fallacy that is characterized by hastily establishing a consequence of a fact without logically reasoning about it. For example, the sentence in the question is a fallacy of overgeneralization because establishing how will be a person's day only for consuming a product in the morning lacks reasoning and evidence. This fallacy as in this example is widely used by industries to get the attention of buyers offering them some good effect just by using the products they sell. So, the correct answer is C. Overgeneralization.
I believe the answers are one and three.
This was a Russian short story entitled The Bet. It was about which is a better punishment, death penalty or solitary confinement.
The lawyer was against the death penalty and favored life imprisonment. The banker thought the other way around. To settle it they both bet for 2 million rubles if the lawyer would stand confinement for 15 years. If not, the banker wins the bet.
Based on the story the answer is false because he bet on one of the options.
