Each author uses non-English words and figurative language.
The authors uses the words tortillas, pachucos, Oom-pah, and Gorditas. These are non-English words. They also use figurative language. When he says took the "tortillas out of his poetry", he is talking about how he is removing evidence of his Hispanic culture from his poetry. He thinks it will give him a better chance. In the second passage they are talking about overhearing someone who seems to wish for a heritage, not realizing that America has a heritage. The sensory detail of the American trees dangling their branches over his head is used to emphasize this.
Her wiliness, thoughtfulness, sense of humor, and underhandedness
Answer:
by using words with negative connotations, such as hacked and merciless
Explanation:
When the authors uses this kind of "tough" words, they want the reader to know that the passage <u>is aimed for more mature audicences</u> because it touches some <u>hard-to-swallow themes such as slavery</u>, and people getting their arms hacked with an axe when they weren't doing their job.
Kant's distinction between guardians and minors is based on the propensity of people to dwell in their own immaturity and let others take care of them. Both guardians and minors are victims of this propensity; only, they are placed on the opposite poles. Neither guardians nor minors dare to think for themselves. However, minors almost entirely give up their intellectual potential, indulging in their own laziness of the mind. They rely on different types of guardians. For example, priests are the guardians of their souls; physicians are the guardians of their bodies; politicians are the guardians of their social order, etc. Basically, they are lulled in their comfortable positions of non-thinkers. We have to say, though, that Kant doesn't judge on people for being one or the other. He just proposes that they can rise above those passive positions with the help of enlightenment.
C, it would be Abraham's house, as it shows possession.
