I think the answer is 'to engage the audience in the tragic story'. I would only reveal the end to capture the attention of the audince and make them wonder why/how the story ends the way it does.
Answer:
<em />
<em>The correct answer is 4) Bob was a good guy. He was the best buddy a guy could have.</em>
Explanation:
- Randy did not want to fight in the new rumble because he knew nothing would bring back Bob.
- In a way, he wanted to honor his best friends death.
- <u>On the other hand, Pony boy wanted to avenge Bob's death and blamed Randy for it.</u>
<u />
- <u>He wanted to teach him a lesson.</u>
- Randy knew everyone was in pain after Bob's death and he thought that this blood-thirsty cycle of fights needs to end.
To be able to do so, we need more information.
This question is incomplete because you are missing part of it; here is the complete question:
Indicate the appropriateness of the subject for a four- to six-page research paper by answering the following question.
Is the following topic suitable for a research paper? Why or why not? how a cheetah eats its food
A. No, it is too broad.
B. No, it is too narrow.
C. Yes, it is broad enough.
D. Yes, it is narrow enough.
The answer to this question is B. No, it is too narrow
Explanation:
In a research paper, especially in one of four to six pages, you are required to provide multiple ideas from different sources to explain the main topic. This implies the topic is appropriate only if it requires the author to give many details or can develop it in 4 to 6 pages. This does not occur if you write about "how a cheetah eats its food" because it is likely cheetahs have only one or few ways to eat their food, and therefore this topic does not require multiple details. According to this, the topic is not suitable because it requires few details or ideas, thus, the reason that makes it inappropriate is that is too narrow.
