I'd choose dark, inaccessible, and comfortless. The other words don't really pin down the tone ("draperies"? "General"?).
Answer:
Yes, the resolution of the novel is satisfactory.
Victor's refusal to do his part of being a 'parent' to the creature is a grave mistake on his part. He should have been ready to take care of him and help him in his needs, however monstrous he may be. But by denying the love and care for his 'child', he is indirectly responsible for how the creature turned up to be, devoid of care, love, and humanistic qualities that Victor could have taught him.
Explanation:
Mary Shelley's gothic novel <em>Frankenstein</em><em> </em>tells the story of how a young scientist surpasses the normal conventions of science and gave life to a creature he will only despise and abhor. The story delves into the nature of humanity and how evil breeds and to beget evil deeds.
Victor Frankenstein's decision to abhor his own created being led to the monster retaliating against him. He began to torture and wreak havoc in his life, killing his near and dear ones. This, I think, is understandable for his own creator denounces and ignores him, leaving him alone in the world. The resolution of Frankenstein which is the death of Victor and his decision to leave everything behind to go up north is satisfactory. Victor, as the creator of the monster, ignores his duty of taking care of his 'child'. This is the parental mistake that will haunt his whole life, and in his case, destroy his world.
This resolution is satisfactory for, in his refusal to take care of his own 'child', he commits the grave mistake of being a parent. And for that, he deserves to suffer for all the wrongs that he had done on the creature, even the very sin of giving him life from the numerous dead parts of many people. If he wasn't ready to play his role of a parent and a creator, he shouldn't have done the deed of giving life to it.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>In both Holinshed and Shakespeare's work, Macbeth is the main character that the audience anticipates. Holinshed created an admirable gent who did not want the death of Mackdonwald. But Shakespeare makes Macbeth a villain by making the character glory being a murderer. Shakespeare changed Macbeth from his Holinshed inspiration to discuss the political issues of his play.Albeit the vast majority of Shakespeare's play " Mac Beth " isn't truly precise, MacBeth's life is the subject of the disaster. There are characters and occasions that depend on obvious occasions and genuine people at the same time, Shakespeare's "Macbeth " varies altogether from history's Macbeth. The primary case of a contrast between the Shakespeare "Macbeth" and verifiable Mac Beth is the demise of Duncan I. In Shakespeare's " Mac Beth ", Duncan I was killed by Macbeth.A prediction said to Mac Beth by one of the three witches "All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be King hereafter1 ." was what incited Gruoch, MacBeth's better half to plot the homicide of Duncan I as he rested in their mansion. Ever, Mac Beth built up himself as the King of Scots in the wake of slaughtering his cousin Duncan I, fighting close Elgin not as in Shakespeare's play by executing him in his rest. Duncan, I was executed on August 14, 1040. Macintosh Beth at that point ruled as ruler for a long time. As recently expressed Duncan I and Mac Beth were cousins, a reality not brought out in the play.</em>
