Answer:
90%
Explanation:
As they believe its real, they will click the link and fill up the details striaght away as they want the "prize"
The correct answer is <em><u>option A. The right to privacy implied in the Ninth Amendment would not protect an individual writing a blog because the information is freely given to others. </u></em>The right to privacy, although not literally addressed in the Constitution of the United States, is protected via some of the Amendments to the Constitution. In the case of the 9th Amendment, this one states that "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people". This excerpt has been interpreted as a way of declaring that the Bill of Rights has the objective to protect and defend privacy, in all ways, even if those ways were not determined in the 8 previous Amendments. If a person publishes personal information on a blog, there would be no invasion of privacy, due to the fact that the information was freely and willingly given to the public.
Answer:
intangible
Explanation:
Intangible value: The term intangible values is referred to as the phenomenon in which the present value of overabundance earning power related to an entity above the normal rate of getting back or return. The intangible value includes things that an individual can't see or touch, for example, goodwill related to a well-established business.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the intangible value.
Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge.
extended family Closely related people of several generations such as brothers, sisters, parents, uncles, aunts, cousins, grandparents and great grandparents
