Answer: Broadsides
Don't have too much context on Art Appreciation for me to give you an eloquent explanation on that one. Sorry haha
According to this ruling, the government can regulate speech if the words that were spoken (or printed) represent a "clear and present danger" to American society.
This ruling came as a consequence of the case <em>Schenck v. United States (1919)</em>, in which the general secretary of the U.S. Socialist Party opposed the implementation of the military draft. He distributed pamphlets encouraging people to oppose the draft. The unanimous decision was that his words represented a clear and present danger to the country, and therefore his arrest was justified.
Answer:
1. Which of the following common European dishes would be impossible to make without goods imported from the Americas during the Columbian Exchange?
C. Tomato sauce and pasta
2. What factors were significant in the decline of both the Mali and Songhai empires?
D. Civil war of succession, and invasions by neighboring countries
Thanks for asking.
I hope the answers were helpful.
Answer:
That moral reasoning is unrelated to the kind of practical reasoning we use in everyday life.
Explanation:
In simple words, critically thinking is a very difficult psychological process for an individuals and doing it for a topic like moral issues, which is subjective in its own manner, makes it way more difficult.
However, saying that moral reasoning is difficult due to its differences with practical world application is completely wrong as morals are clearly defined by social norms on a basic level and one can conduct and implement them easily on a certain level.
