One of the main things that the debate between Madison and Jefferson tells us about the importance of compromise is that it is very rare and sometimes impossible for two people to see "eye to eye" on issues in politics--making compromise absolutely essential if you want to get things done.
1. Circulus in demonstrando: Also known as circular reasoning because the reasoning assumes the conclusion is true.
2. Argumentum ad populum: Sometimes occurs due to “peer pressure” or groupthink phenomenon when you may be influenced to conform to the opinion of the group.
3. Single cause/complex cause: a causal situation where we are unsure of the actual root cause of the issue. It’s possible to ignore a possible cause or to incorrectly assume a common cause.
4. Red herring: this argument states that the action (or conclusion) is a justified response to another wrong action (or conclusion)
5. Argument from ignorance: this occurs when there is no real evidence for the argument. Superstitions are a good example of this.
6. False dilemma: the “either/or” fallacy – the argument presents only two extreme alternatives and does not allow for alternative options.
7. Association fallacy: indicates that one negative action will lead to another, and then another worse one, and so on and so forth all leading to a terrible end result
Answer:
As a result of the three- fifths clause the white south exercised greater power in national affairs than its free population warranted. Letter A
Explanation:
The three -fifths clause determined that every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes. This agreement gave the Southern states more electoral power than they would have if the enslaved population had been ignored entirely.
The appropriate response is Futurism. It was an aesthetic and social development that started in Italy in the mid-twentieth century. It accentuated speed, innovation, youth, and savagery, and questions, for example, the auto, the plane, and the modern city.
