The correct answer to this question is alternative C)"55%"
In the early 1900s there were huge developments in electricity technology, which led the way for more homes to have electricity, thus the increase in the number of homes in the United States with electricity in them.
separation of powers was the principle that was included in most state constitutions.
The separation of powers is a structure in which responsibilities, authority and power are divided between the three branches of government, such as the executive, judiciary and the legislative.
Further Explanation
The purpose of separation of power is to prevent a branch of government from having power over one another. it provides for check and balance between the three branches of government. it also check abuse of power to prevent autocracy.
The tripartite system of government that is found in the United Kingdom and the United State is a popular example of separation of powers in which there are distinct powers between the three branches of government.
Separation of powers is also a reflection of the fact the president cannot appoint a cabinet member without the approval of the congress: the senate in this case.
The legislative have the power to pass law and monitor its implementation, the executive branch of the government has the power to implement the laws, and the judiciary exercises judicial power by deciding on dispute brought before it.
However, the legislative is comprises of both the house of representatives and the senate.They are also called the congress.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
- executive
- legislative
- judiciary
- separation of power
- check and balances
Correct answer choice is:
<h2>What “good behavior” means, with regard to judicial terms/how to create lower federal courts.</h2><h2>Explanation:</h2>
Originally “good behavior” indicates “not bad behavior” i.e. don't violate the rule. So as long as jurists do not do anything to capture them in any problem they can retain their situations for life. On a side note, I think that this resolution by the originators was a masterstroke. The evidence that judges cannot be dismissed, notes all understanding of political revenge out of the equation, suggesting the judge in question is easy to execute his judgments or statements without the emerging panic of failing his job. The judiciary can simply do what he believes is genuine.
