The correct answer is:
The children are wearing loose clothing. The children are exposed to dangerous machinery. The children are not wearing any protective gear.
These are some of the dangers these child workers were exposed to.

To better understand how geospatial technologies assist governments and NGOs (non-governmental agencies), we must know what geospatial technologies are. This refers to the tools that contribute to the geographic mapping and analysis of the Earth and human societies. This allows us to collect data regarding the changes of the phenomena of land. By analyzing this data, it will provide benefits by creating a plan to face famine, unexplained diseases and other natural occurrences.
The answer is C because in the constitution it allowed the states to choose and make their own laws and slavery was a law that the southerners wanted.
B. Arguments in favor of slavery are senseless.
Lincoln demonstrates int eh passage that every argument for the existence of slavery as it stood in the US could be easily countered or reversed. This shows that the arguments for slavery were weak and "senseless".
Lincoln belong to the Free-Soil Party before the Republican Party was created. Free-Soilers did not want slavery to extend any further than it had already existed in the 1850's. Essentially they didn't want it to go into the new territories. They believed that slavery was a dying institution and if not allowed to grow it would smother itself out. As Lincoln became president, his views began to include more of a moral stance suggesting enslaving another person was wrong.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. In Tinker v. Des Moines Justice Fortas argues that it would be obvious that students' rights are violated "if a regulation were adopted by school officials forbidding discussion of the Vietnam conflict . . . except as part of a prescribed classroom exercise."
Explanation:
The opinion of Justice Fortas, which corresponds to the majority position of the Court in the case, establishes that the prohibition to students to discuss positions regarding the Vietnam War is clearly in violation of the students' rights to express their opinions, which is framed in the right to freedom of speech guaranteed in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.