Answer:
The answer is to convince readers that a prince must choose a trustworthy servant to represent him
Explanation:
Niccolo Machiavelli, the author of the revolutionary and controversial book, 'The Prince' wrote the passage stated in Chapter 22 to convince its readers that a prince must choose a trustworthy servant to represent him.
Machiavelli wrote that <u>a servant is a representation or a reflection of what kind of person the prince is</u>. He argued that although a servant is of no importance to a prince, his presence and traits will be a basis of forming an impression or an opinion about the prince.
For example, if a servant is faithful and capable, he will be known as a wise prince because he has the power and ability to make them loyal and competent. And the same goes if they are dishonest and inept, it will make him look a weak and incapable prince.
Benvolio will be right, and Romeo will forget all about Rosaline.
Romeo and Benvolio will be revealed as Montagues, and a fight will break out.
Juliet will make a decision about whether she wants to marry Paris.
The question asks about your personal opinion when it says, "What do you think". However, there are some choices that make the most sense based on what you know because of any prior knowledge you have of the story and the prologue. We know that Romeo will not be with Rosaline in the end, so it would be logical to think that she is no longer a love interest of his when he sees Juliet at the party. Also, the prologue mentions that there will be new mutiny in regards to the ancient grudge, so we can expect more fighting. Last, we know that Juliet has to make a decision about marrying Paris at the party because of the conversation she had with her mother. Of course, we know what that decision will be, but still.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
What the persona is asking the reader to bring, according to one of the verses of the poem is "more promises, contrived images, false hopes when in truth you’re thinking how to butcher us even more."
Indeed, the final part of the poem ends with the following verse: <em>"The next time we meet & you find us restless speak to us of your visions. Regale us with More promises, contrived images, false hopes when in truth you’re thinking how to butcher us even more."</em>
We are talking about the poem "Coup De Gracé," written by Noel Moratilla. Coupe de Grace is a Frech expression that can be translated into English as "Final Stroke." The poem reflects the pain, destruction, and desolation that many poor people live after people have "blind eyes" for not noticing the problems and needs of the desperate ones.
Answer:
Professor Sherry Turkle's little "sips" of online connection is a metaphor that describes the little "pieces" of conversation that we are having by using technological devices.
Explanation:
MIT Professor, Sherry Turkle, PhD, and a licensed clinical psychologist, with a joint doctorate in sociology and psychology, notes that people are now avoiding the necessary conversations that we ought to be having with one another because we are "plugged-in" to various technological devices. In her write-up in the New York Times of April 21, 2012 titled "The Flight from Conversation," Professor Sherry Turkle urges people not to "sacrifice conversation for mere connection." Since we are technology-enabled, she declares that we should make the best use of it to remain conversationally connected to others whether they are near or far, but must still bring ourselves to enjoy the indispensable face-to-face conversations with our fellow human beings.
