Well I'm guessing that I can pick out of these answers: <span>a. It helps the reader understand the implications of events better than the narrator could.
b. It makes the story more interesting for the reader by adding a layer of mystery.
c. It allows the reader to understand and better relate to the motivations of the narrator.
d. It allows the reader to cast judgment toward the narrator in the story.
e. It indicates the thoughts of the narrator and other characters more clearly to the reader.
</span>
// I've seen this question before on plato
Out of all of them the correct answer is c. It allows the reader to understand and better relate to the motivations of the narrator.
The fundamental message of the story is that captivation doesn't generally break even with genuine romance. We would all be able to feel for the young lady in the story who is complimented by the young fellow's consideration. He is a quintessential tease; his initially signal is to enclose his arms warmly and defensively around her midriff when he inquires as to whether she minds him skating with her. He takes order of every circumstance, is firmly mindful to her, and converses with her in a private way. The young lady falls hard for him, yet this is just an amusement for somebody who is known as a 'top dog' in school and the 'best artist around the local area.'
She is infatuated to the point that she trusts him when he says he will call. In any case, she is soon disillusioned and takes in reality that each young person in the long run gets: an ace tease regularly knows how to control the feelings of others further bolstering his good fortune, however it never prompts a promising relationship for the person who trusts.
Concerning word decision, the creator cunningly utilizes some viable scholarly gadgets to depict the failure and torment of a youthful heart. No where is this more clear than in the last passage.
Tonight is Tuesday. Tonight is Tuesday and my homework is done and I darned some stocking that truly didn't require it, and I worked a cross-word perplex and I tuned in to the radio and now I'm quite recently sitting. I'm quite recently sitting since I can't consider whatever else to do.
The utilization of anaphora (as in the words "today around evening time" and 'I') and anadiplosis (as in the expression 'I'm recently sitting') features a great deal of reiteration on the young lady's part; her nervousness is horrendously clear. She is essentially recently captivating in monotonous, careless assignments to relax on the off chance that the young fellow calls. At last, she understands that
For out of the blue, I know, I realize what the stars knew all the time - he will never, never call - never.
The redundancy of "never" ( epimone) and "know" features the young lady's mental and enthusiastic anguish. Each "never" resembles a throbbing injury; the young fellow has let her down horrendously, and it harms.
A. a style of jazz developed in Harlem.
One of the things that helps in determining that “boogie-woogie”
refers to a style of jazz developed in Harlem is the third word of the first
line—“daddy.” What daddy is referring to
is the term “daddy-o,” which was a term for a male commonly used in the jazz
era in the Harlem area among others, but its origin is certainly attributed to the jazz
culture.
One of the euphemisms in "From Emperor to Citizen" is Puppet. It refers to Pu Yi who was called Emperor, but was actually controlled by the Japanese. Another euphemism is Forbidden City, because it wasn't forbidden for those who worked and lived there.
This question is about "A Quilt of a Country"
Answer and Explanation:
Mario Cuomo's enigma was exposed to show how the USA imposes the concept of individualism on its growing population and encourages the adoption of this concept in all possible activities, however, in addition to being a defining concept of the American population, it is also a concept that is in constant conflict, thus creating a "social paradox", so to speak, because the nation that grew in an individualistic way, sees itself in various situations where it needs to work in the collectivity and in solidarity.
Within the text, Quindlen uses this concept of conflict between the collective and individualism as support for the argument that the USA is a multicultural nation, full of the most different ethnicities, but all this difference does not prevent the country made up of a single people that is subject to a single government.
