All categories

2 years ago

Cody Barnett enjoys several advantages as a Sonic franchisee. Which of the following is NOT an advantage of franchising?

Business

2 answers:

Alenkasestr [34]2 years ago

7 0

Option E is correct. The management regulation is not an advantage of franchising.

Further Explanation:

Franchise: Franchising is a form of business where the franchisor (who has an established brand name) gives the right to the franchisee to use its trademark, products, services, and also provide training and assistance for operating the business. The advantages of the franchising are:

• Marketing and Management assistance: The training is provided by the franchisor to the franchisee on how to carry on the business and also provide marketing assistance.

• Personal ownership: The franchisee is the owner of the business in the territory of which is he /she purchased the rights. He pays the royalty for the right purchased

• Nationally recognized name: The franchisor's business usually has a global presence, so it is nationally recognized.

• Financial advice and assistance: The franchisor provides financial assistance and advice to the franchisee so that the business can maintain its brand name.

• Lower failure rates: Since the franchise has a global presence and brand position, so chance of failure is lower.

Therefore, the management regulation is not a benefit of franchising because the franchisee cannot change the way management is being done, although the business is owned by the franchisee.

Learn more:

1. Learn more about the management resource activity

brainly.com/question/10700933

2. Learn more about the management charactistics

brainly.com/question/10649225

3. Learn more about customer relationship management

brainly.com/question/6657146

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Business

Chapter: International business

Keywords: Cody Barnett, Sonic franchise, management assistance, personal ownership, lower failure rate, management regulation, nationally recognized name.

solong [7]2 years ago

3 0

Management regulation is not an advantage of franchising

When a larger company gives another firm a license or a permit to use their intellectual property such as brand name, trademark, designs, and others, it is a common practice called franchising

<h2>Further Explanation</h2>

It is simply an agreement between two business partners, whereby a manufacturer allowed another firm or individual, the rights to make use of its brand name, trademark, and designs

In franchising, the company that gives a license to another firm is known as the franchiser whiles the entity or individual that is allowed to use the company intellectual property is known as the franchisee

The franchisee obtains a franchise from the franchiser by paying a certain amount of money as a startup fee and the franchiser on its part also provides necessary training and guidance to the franchisee regularly. One of the common practices among the larger company is franchising as it promotes business expansion.

Some of the advantages of franchising include

It widens the business network of the franchiser
It enables franchisers to expands its distribution chain within a short period
It gives feedback to franchisers concerning how popular their products are performing in the market, what the customers want and many more

Some characteristics of franchising include

Policies
Training
Royalty
Limited period
License

LEARN MORE:

Management regulation brainly.com/question/11237752
What are the advantages and disadvantages of investing in a franchise for both the franchisee and franchisor brainly.com/question/1780353

KEYWORDS:

franchising
advantage
franchisee
management regulation
agreement

You might be interested in

Mike and Sandy are two woodworkers who both make tables and chairs. In one month, Mike can make 4 tables or 20 chairs, where San

zzz [600]

Answer:

Option (a) is correct.

Explanation:

Mike can make 4 tables or 20 chairs:

Opportunity cost of producing 1 chair = 4 ÷ 20

= 0.2

Sandy can make 6 tables or 18 chairs:

Opportunity cost of producing 1 chair = 6 ÷ 18

= 0.33

Therefore,

Mike has the comparative advantage in producing chair because he has the lower opportunity cost as compared to Sandy.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Investment X offers to pay you $4,200 per year for eight years, whereas Investment Y offers to pay you $6,100 per year for five

marishachu [46]

Answer:

PVxa = $27,132.00, PVya = $26,413.00,

Explanation:

Present value (PV) is the value of the future expected cash flow. PV rests on the idea that the worth of a cash received is more than that of the cash promised to be received in the future. To calculate PV a stream of incomes to be received a number of period in the future, the following formula is used:

$PV = C[\frac{1-(1+r)^{-n} }{r} ]$

Where PV = present value

C = cash flow amount from the investment

r = discount rate

n = number of period, in this case years, to receive the cash flow.

The PV formula above is therefore employed to answer the question as follows:

Answer to question (a)

For Investment X in question (a)

PVxa = $4,200 * {[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVxa = $4,200 * {[1-(1+0.05)^-8]/0.05}

PVxa = $4,200 * 6.463212759

PVxa = $27,145.49

For Investment Y in question (a)

PVya = $6,100*{[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVya = $6,100*{[1-(1+0.05)^-5]/0.05}

PVya = $6,100 * 4.329476671

PVya = $26,409.81

Answer to question (b)

For Investment X in question (b)

PVxb = $4,200 * {[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVxb = $4,200 * {[1-(1+0.15)^-8]/0.15}

PVxb = $4,200 * 4.487321508

PVxb = $18,846.75

For Investment Y in question (b)

PVyb = $6,100*{[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVyb = $6,100*{[1-(1+0.15)^-5]/0.15}

PVyb = $6,100 * 3.352155098

PVyb = $20,448.15

Where PVxa, PVya, PVxb and PVyb represents PV for X and Y in questions (a) and (b).

Decisions:

1. In question (a) part where the PV of $27,145.49 of X is greater than $26,409.81 of investment Y, it is better to invest on investment X.

2. In question (b) part where the PV of $20,448.15 of Y is now greater than $18,846.75 of investment X, it is better to invest on investment Y.

7 0

2 years ago

Assuming beginning work in process is zero, the equivalent units of production computed using fifo versus weighted average will

Sloan [31]

Answer:

4. Weighted-average equivalent units will be equal to FIFO equivalent units.

Explanation:

Equivalent units of production is been applied to the work-in-process inventory when an accounting period comes to an end. It can be regarded as expression that gives amount of work done which was recorded by a manufacturer over a units of output which was partially completed after an accounting period. For instance, if there are 100 units that are in process, then 40% of processing cost is expended , then we can say there are 40 equivalent units of production. It should be noted that the if beginning work in process is zero, the equivalent units of production computed using fifo versus weighted average will have a relationship in such a way that Weighted-average equivalent units will be equal to FIFO equivalent units.

4 0

2 years ago

Kubin Company's relevant range of production is 20,000 to 23,000 units. When it produces and sells 21,500 units,its average cost

Lady_Fox [76]

Answer:

a.Incremental manufacturing cost is $15.50

b.incremental cost incurred if the company increases production and sales is $17.50

c.Incremental manufacturing cost is $4,650

d.incremental selling and administrative is $600

Explanation:

a.Incremental manufacturing cost

Fixed manufacturing overheads are irrelevant

Direct materials $8.00

Direct labor $5.00

Variable manufacturing overhead $2.50

Total $15.50

b.incremental cost incurred if the company increases production and sales

Incremental Manufacturing Costs $15.50

Add Sales Commission $2.00

Total $17.50

c.Incremental manufacturing cost

Fixed manufacturing costs are irrelevant for this decision

Direct Materials (300×$8.00) $2,400

Direct Labor (300×$5.00) $1,500

Variable Manufacturing Overhead (300×$2.50) $ 750

Total $4,650

d.incremental selling and administrative

Fixed Selling and Administrative costs are irrelevant for this decision

Sales Commission (300×$2.00) $600

8 0

2 years ago

Julie filed a valid extension for her 2017 tax return, giving her until October 15, 2018, to file her return. She filed her retu

Colt1911 [192]

Answer and Explanation:

Julie will have to pay for each month she is unable to file her return. She will be subjected to failure to file if she fails to file her tax return on the last date of the due date or extension date given to her. After that she will have to pay penalty. The penalty would increase with further delay.

3 0

2 years ago