The correct answer should be B.
C is not because classical poetry did not deal with Christ, while D is wrong because neoclassical style did not use enjambment. A is far too simple for it to be a neoclassical poem.
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question so I had to look for it. Anyway, here is the answer. According to "Introduction to Cultural Rebellion: Mid-Twentieth-Century Voices," what motivated both science fiction and beat generation authors in the United States after World War II is the <span>disillusionment with modern society. Hope this helps.</span>
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
Answer:
1. The principal congratulated me because I had came first in the exams.
2. Steve's neighbour said that he drove an expensive car.
3. The journalist said that the economy is getting better.
4. She said that I was the responsible of revealing Hanna's secret.
5. The correspondent said the president would be here to inspect the damage.
6. Viru's mother hurried him up and said that the bus would be there in a minute.
7. He asked one of them to let him see the streets once more before he died. He also said he would be back in five minutes.
8. My grandfather wished me long life.
9. His teammate said he spoke German well.
10. Mr. Jain asked his colleague if he would drop him at the airport.
11. He asked me if I could tell him how to get to the ait gallery.
Explanation:
In English, we use the Indirect speech to transmit someone's words, statements, messages, etc. without quoting them explicitly.
In Indirect speech we must make some changes in the form of a sentence, this is, modify the point in time and place and the person speaking, according to the Indirect speech rules. This refers to the verbal tenses, pronouns, adverbs of place, time, etc.
