Answer:
I think its B
Explanation:
since a professor has already written books on the production of food he should be well prepared for writing an article. People who already write have a better ability to grab a reader's attention.
the tv reporter has only visited a single fast food museum, so he wouldn't have much to write on.
the former worker is already mad at being fired (he would write negatively about the place) and only has knowledge about meat. (in my opinion)
the senator could be a good option but his field is law not writing.
hope this helps :-)
(Apex) Answer is C.
<span>"I did right in refusing to create a companion for the first creature. He showed unparalleled malignity and selfishness in evil: he destroyed my friends; he devoted to destruction beings who possessed exquisite sensations . . ." (322).
</span>
It would really depend on what line 39 is but if I had to guess I would guess A. To remain in one place
Answer:
A laugh stops pointless argument.
Explanation:
The story of Satish is all about a community who is not wise and quarrels with each other on little disagreements. Satish saw two people fighting over their preferences of Idli or Dosa. Every person has his own food choices according to his taste but here people seems to disagree with the facts and starts arguing on pointless topics. There comes another man who thinks he is wise but makes a statement Dosa with chocolate, and here the argument continues. The only thing that helped stop the pointless arguments among the people of community was Satish's unintended laugh. The title that best suits the story is "A laugh stops pointless argument".