<span>Francesco Petrarch is considered to be a Father of
Humanism and Renaissance because he was one of the pillars of their doctrine. Humanism
is epoch of the rebirth of a man as the center of the new world (but not
without God). He was the one of the first poets, alongside Leonardo da Vinci
and Giovanni Boccaccio, to speak and write about human internal conflicts,
moral, ethics and love. His works that best represent his doctrine are “Secretum
Meum” and “Canzioniere”.</span>
Slavery made certain races slaves while leaving others free
Hope this helps
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
What Morgan argued about the role of plantation owners in shaping patriotic rhetoric was that after Bacon's rebellion, landlords stop using indentured servitude, although in some cases it was cheaper than to buy black slaves.
So with this change, plantation owners started to form the patriotic rhetoric that exalted their work and actions were for the benefit of colonial America. They tried to maintain relatively social stability, for instance, in the Jamestown, Virginia, colony, that benefited their production and exportation of cash crops to Europe.
Edmund Sears Morgan (1916-2013) was an American professor and historian who worked at the universities of Chicago, Brown, and Yale, and specialized in the history of the American colonies.
For the answer to the questions above, I believe that <em><u>it is because the constitution is a living document and it should not be stagnant and resistant to change, and is therefore allowed to change to meet the USA's needs at the time.</u></em>
What is working before maybe won't work in the future.
Naïve citizens allow corrupt governments.
In literature, <u>situational irony</u> creates a contrast between what the readers might expect and what actually happens in the text. The goal is to shed light on the difference between appearances and the reality, with regard to a particular theme.
Here, the irony is that even though the farm produces more and gains more money, the animals who worked for this progress to happen are not getting the profits of this improvement. All the money goes to the hands of the ruling class (the pigs and the dogs), because the other animals are naïve enough to believe that the rulers' "supervision and organisation" work is enough to justify this unfair wealth distribution.
