The roles of European monopoly companies on the development of overseas territories are:
They were profit-driven
They wanted an competitive market
They would get cheaper labor
They would get cheaper materials
A monopolistic market is one where there is only one producer and distributor in a market, without any significant competitor.
The Europeans wanted a monopolistic market so they had to expand overseas as a means of getting cheap labor and other advantages which would help them increase profit.
Please do not copy word for word, you WILL need to rephrase everything I say in your OWN WORDS.
The executive branch and the legislative branch are two complete different things, and both have different jobs. The executive branch enforces the laws, and legislative creates the laws. It's a question to be reckoned with-- Who was going to enforce laws between the north and south? The executive branch. Of course, the legislator is the reason it passed, but they cannot enforce any laws, they cannot hold trials, they only lead it up into the Judicial branch. To put this bluntly, someone needed to enforce it.
I could not be entirely correct, as I'm going based off what I know of the reconstructive plans, and the government branches. If you care to knowledge me more on what the reconstruction plans, I could possibly change it up and put it towards a more accurate response.
Answer:
The fundamental principle of a Republic form of government is the separation of different government bodies and the limits of power on the head of State.
Explanation:
In effect, this means that the government and the country are 'public matters' and not the affair of a few unelected head of States.
The basic idea is to give power back to the people and ensure that the country is run by the many and not the few.
The ideals of Republican government are not new and have existed in some form since the ancient Roman Republics.
Today, most countries describe themselves as Republics, though, it is a matter of dispute if they are truly are one.
The conclusion about the use of U.S. military power would be most logically drawn from the experience of the Iraq War is: <span>A. After a military victory, the defeated country may remain unstable and dangerous.
After we use military power to obliterate the leader of these terrorist groups that controlled the middle east we should not directly leave and not doing some follow up because it will create a politcal vacuum and invited many people from other groups see this as an opportunity to gain power.</span>
