Answer:
Women were required to forgive men’s emotions, especially anger.
Explanation:
You can see how Helmer is trying to explain how he was foolishly speaking when he was angered earlier to Nora. However, Nora doesn't seem to understand that Helmer was just foolishly speaking.
Have a good day.
Answer:
If I were Nilda, I would complain about the situations with my immediate boss, probably a supervisor, even if it risks straining the relationship with the other coworkers.
The reason is that in such a situation, not only Nilda is being overworked, but the overall situation of the sales department is worsening. This is why in this circumstances, Nilda has to talk to her supervisor.
The primary theme in An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge is (C) the line between dreams and reality is thin. Throughout the course of the short story, the illusion of Farquhar represents a reality for the readers. So it shows how thin the line is between fantasy and reality.
<span>“First Generation” of Dreaming in Cuban is actually a story that was written by Cristina Garcia, and based on the excerpt above taken from this, the statement that would best describe the changes that the narrator assumes to be true regarding Pilar is that her way of expressing in Spanish shows that she is a product of multiculturalism. The answer would be option A.</span>
Read the excerpt from "The Most Dangerous Game." "Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs be, taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. I am strong. Why should I not use my gift? If I wish to hunt, why should I not? I hunt the scu m of the earth—sailors from tramp ships—lascars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels—a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than a score of them." "But they are men," said Rainsford hotly. This excerpt shows that unlike Zaroff, Rainsford has still retained his sense of fairness. humanity. humor. entitlement.
Answer:
This excerpt shows that unlike Zaroff, Rainsford has retained his sense of HUMANITY.
Explanation:
From the excerpt, Zaroff is talking about human beings and comparing them to thoroughbred horses and calling them despicable names, vowing that he would kill as much as he can because he is strong but they are weak.
In contrast, Rainsford counters him in an angry manner by reminding him that they are still human beings which shows that Rainsford still retains his humanity.