<u>The correct answer is: A) to reveal the traumatic impact of the Holocaust had on his life .</u> The author tried to understand why so many deaths in the holocaust, what was the point of that factory of death, how to explain the insane mind that devised this black hole in history called Birkenau and then thought that perhaps there was nothing to understand and that the reason for the holocaust will always be incomprehensible.
Answer: The noun clause in the first sentence is "Whatever you do", while the noun clause in the second sentence is "what she should major in at college".
Explanation: A noun clause is a dependent clause, that is to say a clause that does not express a full thought, which functions as a noun. Moreover, a noun clause is generally introduced by a relative pronoun. In the first sentence<u>, the noun clause is "Whatever you do" and it is functioning as the subject of the sentence, while in the second sentence, the noun clause is "what she should major in at college" and it is performing the function of direct object. </u>Therefore, both of them are acting as nouns.
It is C, Mark Antony refutes Brutus’ accusations of Caesar being overly ambitious
by giving examples of his humility and his great love for Romans, whom
he named as heirs in his will; mutiny might be an expected reaction from
the Roman crowd.
The section of the "volcanoes" page of the Ready.gov website that cautions people to be aware of mudflows is During
.The correct answer is D.
On the third point of do's they say and I quote "Avoid areas downwind, and river valleys downstream, of the volcano. Rubble and ash will be carried by wind and gravity.", this can be represented by mudflows.
There are no other parts in the page that talk about that so the other options cannot be correct since they are talking about incorrect segments of information.
In the Michio Kaku's book, Visions, he states that we are continuing to rush ahead. To prove that, he says “In the past decade more scientific knowledge has been created than in all of human history.” Since we are so advance, we don't need to be observers "of the dance of Nature". We have moved “from being passive observers of Nature to being active choreographers of Nature.” We are no longer discovering, now we are creating. Conserning future predictions Kaku says to listen to "those who create it".
