The correct answer is:
One must know the process of hiring servants.
In the excerpt, especially here:
<em> "when you see the servant thinking more of his own interests than of yours, and seeking inwardly his own profit in everything, such a man will never make a good servant, nor will you ever be able to trust him; because he who has the state of another in his hands ought never to think of himself, but always of his prince, and never pay any attention to matters in which the prince is not concerned."</em>
They describe how to analyze a servant, how to know when they are going to priorize you, and if the servant does not checks for all of this characteristics is better not to hire him.
- interesting topics
- opening that hooks the reader
- words that describe and put the reader in the writers thoughts
- thesis statement
are all important things for a good essay
<u>Answer:</u>
Based on the excerpt, the most reasonable plot prediction is that (A) Farquhar may unknowingly walk into a trap.
<u>Explanation:</u>
“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” by “Ambrose Bierce” is a story set during American Civil War. The soldier had disguised himself and he was a scout. Gradually in the story we come to know that 'Farquhar' had been set up through a tricky play. So, the correct option is option A.
Farquhar is a supporter of confederate. Thinking that the soldier that came is confederate he informed about the movements of the Union soldiers, thinking Confederate could win the war with this information. But the 'Confederate soldier' was a Union soldier in disguise.
Answer:
the correct ansrew would be C)early promoters of UFC events were eager to work with state atheletic commissions without public pressure being a necessary inducement
Explanation:
i just took the quiz & this was the ansrew but also counter viewpoint is another word for opposing viewpoint which means they are asking for an opposite opinion rhen the story
Answer: We are not initially responsible for the capture of slaves taken as a result of war.
The first statement disputes the claim because it argues that captives from wars might still be taken in an unjust way. The third statement similarly disputes the claim by arguing that not all captives are victims of combat, but some were kidnapped despite their peaceful existence. Finally, the last statement argues that even if captives were taken lawfully in those wars, it would still be a great kindness to help them.
The second statement, on the other hand, supports the claim. It argues that the capture of slaves is not our responsibility, as they have been lawfully taken during war.
