Is prideful and overly confident --i hope this helps
This question is incomplete because you are missing part of it; here is the complete question:
Indicate the appropriateness of the subject for a four- to six-page research paper by answering the following question.
Is the following topic suitable for a research paper? Why or why not? how a cheetah eats its food
A. No, it is too broad.
B. No, it is too narrow.
C. Yes, it is broad enough.
D. Yes, it is narrow enough.
The answer to this question is B. No, it is too narrow
Explanation:
In a research paper, especially in one of four to six pages, you are required to provide multiple ideas from different sources to explain the main topic. This implies the topic is appropriate only if it requires the author to give many details or can develop it in 4 to 6 pages. This does not occur if you write about "how a cheetah eats its food" because it is likely cheetahs have only one or few ways to eat their food, and therefore this topic does not require multiple details. According to this, the topic is not suitable because it requires few details or ideas, thus, the reason that makes it inappropriate is that is too narrow.
This question is about the article "American flag stands for tolerance"
Answer and Explanation:
Allen shows that he believes that an individual can present better ways to show his discontent with the government instead of disrespecting the national flag by burning it, with that, we can see that he does not agree with the Supreme Court's decision to allow the burning of flags is a fair protest against the government, but quickly Allen claims that the Supreme Court is correct in allowing this, since even presenting a form of disrespect, the burning of flags is part of a peaceful protest, in addition to allowing freedom of expression in the country.
This shows that Allen's arguments are based on the country's ethical and legal standards and not on his own opinions, or on the sentimetalism he may feel for national symbols. He addresses the counterargument as a justification as to why he should not evaluate the Supreme Court's permission, but rather support it. This can be seen through the paragraph:
<em>"The American flag is a cherished symbol of our national aspirations [...] iven the widespread and deeply felt reverence for this symbol of what we perceive to be the best of our civilization, what is the harm in insisting upon a modicum of respect for it? [...] Any messages that burning the flag might convey easily can be communicated in other ways. </em>
<em>The Supreme Court was not wrong. Indeed, a decision contrary to the one reached would have been a definitive step away from our national aspirations. A commitment to the intertwined freedoms of conscience and expression is at the core of those aspirations. What most distinguishes our civilization from both its predecessors and its contemporary competitors is a belief in the sanctity of the human conscience. Each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom. That requires not just the right to be let alone, but also the right to communicate with, to learn from and test views in conversations."</em>
Answer:
Deducting some percentage of amount from savings and investing them in bonds will give higher rates.
Explanation:
It is believed that bond is better than savings. Stocks and bonds together are as good as mutual funds and saving accounts together. So, Chris should increase the investment in Stock and deduct that amount from mutual. Also, he can deduct some amount form savings and invest in bonds. This would give him higher interest rates.
In a nutshell, there is some amount in mutual and some amount in savings, which would be beneficial in case there is any loss in stock and bonds.
1.- Because the reasons for teaching English were for personal growth and curriculum, a practice of mutual benefit, and became a massive international business.
2.- Ryan says that the TOEFL was given a lot of power and it became a weapon where the poorest were excluded, since the prices for the exam are very high and at the same time it does not let discover the intelligence of those who don´t approve it.3 .- The diversity of languages can help cooperation and improve understanding of some things, what someone may not understand in one language, someelse may do it in another.4.- He invented a cost free solar lamp, so that children of his village could have the same light to study as those who enjoyed electricity.5.- He meant that people who did not have their own light could never pass exams, do not let a language divide us and leave us in the dark, intelligence is not measured by how much English people speak.