answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-BARSIC- [3]
2 years ago
9

Match each action to Marbury or madison:

History
2 answers:
Bas_tet [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

-Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.

Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

yKpoI14uk [10]2 years ago
6 0

Madison:

Refused to honor an appointment

Marbury :

Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789

Argued for original jurisdiction

Was appointed as a federal judge

 

You might be interested in
Which are characteristics of Russia's geography? Choose all answers that are correct. A. Russia spans two continents—Europe and
pantera1 [17]
I believe the only correct answers are A. Spanning through Asia and Europe, and D. Kiev is where the revolution is taking place that has Ukrainians worried that Russia will attack.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Problems for Business and Industry cause the Great Depression?
Nat2105 [25]

It began after the stock market crash of October 1929, which sent Wall Street into a panic and wiped out millions of investors. Over the next several years, consumer spending and investment dropped, causing steep declines in industrial output and employment as failing companies laid off workers.

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements is NOT TRUE of the Industrial Revolution time period?
balandron [24]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Industrial Revolution was in the 18th and 19th century

8 0
1 year ago
Coba kalian identifikasi/temukan nilai nilai apa saja yang terdapat dalam puisi demokrasi kebun binatang
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

Dalam sebulan terakhir, kematian hewan di penangkaran telah menyoroti kekhawatiran yang terus berlanjut seputar konservasi. Kebun binatang adalah hiburan, dan meski berkontribusi pada konservasi, mereka tidak memberikan solusi nyata apa pun. Satwa liar hanya dapat diselamatkan dengan memberdayakan perlindungan mereka di habitat alaminya sendiri — dan itu berarti kita harus bekerja dengan komunitas lokal dan bukan melawan mereka.

Pada 28 Mei 2016, misalnya, Harambe, seekor gorila yang lahir di penangkaran, ditembak mati setelah seorang bocah lelaki jatuh ke kandangnya di Kebun Binatang Cincinnati di Amerika Serikat. Seminggu sebelumnya, dua singa dimusnahkan di Kebun Binatang Metropolitan Santiago di Chili, dan seminggu sebelumnya seekor gajah Sumatera bernama Yani mati di Kebun Binatang Surabaya yang terkenal kejam di Indonesia. Diskusi online telah meledak tentang masing-masing kasus menyedihkan ini, tetapi pada umumnya itu adalah debat yang mengecualikan pandangan orang-orang yang paling penting untuk sukses.

Penentang kebun binatang seperti Marc Bekoff, seorang ahli ekologi perilaku dan profesor emeritus di Universitas Colorado, berpendapat bahwa kehidupan hewan di penangkaran adalah bayangan dari pengalaman mereka di alam liar. Para pendukung kebun binatang seperti Asosiasi Kebun Binatang dan Akuarium Dunia berpendapat bahwa manfaat konservasi yang diberikan kebun binatang lebih besar daripada biaya terisolasi (meskipun tragis) yang dibayarkan oleh hewan yang terlibat.

Di media sosial, para pendukung kebun binatang mengatakan bahwa hewan-hewan penangkaran berfungsi sebagai 'duta' konservasi untuk rekan-rekan mereka yang liar, dan bahwa kebun binatang adalah 'Bahtera Nuh' yang menyediakan penyangga terhadap penurunan spesies yang terancam punah. Sebenarnya, ini adalah naskah yang bahkan diam-diam ditinggalkan oleh industri kebun binatang.

Sementara beberapa spesies seperti oryx, serigala dan condor mendapat manfaat dari program penangkaran, ada sedikit bukti berharga bahwa genetika yang dibiakkan di kebun binatang digunakan untuk memperkuat populasi gorila, gajah, dan lumba-lumba liar. Kebun binatang menyadari bahwa mereka tidak memiliki cukup ruang untuk terlibat dalam program pemuliaan mamalia besar yang berhasil, dan tidak dapat menampung lebih dari sebagian kecil dari 22.784 spesies di dunia yang terancam punah. Jadi, mengapa kebun binatang bertahan?

Kebun binatang memulai kehidupan sebagai hiburan, dan sementara mereka berevolusi, mereka masih ada untuk menghasilkan uang dan memanfaatkan selera masyarakat yang kaya akan hiburan. Tetapi pada tingkat yang lebih dalam, mereka adalah komponen kunci dari sistem konservasi internasional yang menyerupai masa lalu kolonial dan rasial Barat. Sistem ini percaya bahwa komunitas di belahan dunia tempat sebagian besar spesies yang terancam punah hidup adalah masalah yang harus diperbaiki — paling sering dengan memperoleh tanah tradisional, mendirikan kamp dan pengalaman lain untuk turis kaya, dan mempekerjakan penjaga pembawa senjata untuk berpatroli di perbatasan taman dan cagar alam.

Saya harap saya membantu Anda! :)

7 0
2 years ago
briefly explain how one historical event or development in the period 1787 to 1803 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excer
Hatshy [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the excerpt to know what you are talking about.

Although you did not include the excerpt, the name of the text, or the author, we can do some research and help you with the following general comments.

One historical event in the period 1787 to 1803 that would be used to support Ellis's interpretation is the United States President Thomas Jefferson's historical interpretation about the approval of the Louisiana Purchase.

For historian Joseph J. Ellis, the issue was the way President Thomas Jefferson proceeded to buy the Louisiana territory to the French, knowing that he could have been going beyond his powers as the head of the executive branch. The question for historian Ellis is not that his decision over the territory was right, but the way he implemented that decision that challenged his powers as President. Thomas Jefferson had big hopes that the next step for the American government was in the conquest of the western part of the United States.

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Read this letter written by US General Ulysses S. Grant. Which sentences most clearly indicate that the writing style is informa
    9·1 answer
  • Where did columbus land when he found america riddle?
    6·2 answers
  • The history of this institution demonstrates the need for eternal vigilance to ensure that lobbyists do not abuse their role, th
    9·2 answers
  • Roosevelt uses the term “square deal” in the second-to-last sentence of the excerpt. What has changed about the meaning of the t
    13·2 answers
  • Using the passage below, please answer the question that follows. The Tuscarora people lived in the eastern areas of North Carol
    6·1 answer
  • What motivated the Red Guards to create chaos during the Cultural
    14·2 answers
  • Why did Churchill oppose the appeasement of Hitler in 1938 (pp. 390-392)? How did this influence his proposed foreign policy wit
    8·1 answer
  • An enslaved person who learned a skilled trade most likely worked for a plantation owner. small farmer. saddle maker. rancher.
    14·2 answers
  • "When the Articles of Confederation were drafted, Americans had little experience of what a national government could do for the
    12·1 answer
  • How were the challenges of maintaining land-based empires, such as the Russian and Qing states, different from the challenges of
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!