The correct answer is B) He is not likely to be categorized as having an anti-social personality disorder.
Under DSM-5, the statement that is most likely true is "He is not likely to be categorized as having an anti-social personality disorder."
The DSM-5 is the Diagnosis and Staticals Manual of mental Disorders. It is the most important reference for mental health practitioners in America and has been a good reference for the health industry in other countries.
An anti-social personality disorder is known to be a kind of disorder where the individual does not respect or violate the rights of other persons, no matter what of why. It likes to step over the rights of others without thinking about the consequences, and that is what Anders does.
ANSWER: C)mentoring
EXPLANATION: The process of working for an expert as an intern in the industry is known as Mentoring. During this phase, Amanda will be learning important aspects of how to become a good industrial designer. She will be accompanying the industry expert during his works which will help her learn how to do her job more effectively and efficiently when she will be working independently.
Answer:
E. suggests that the speaker's vocabulary is limited
Explanation:
The question above is related to the poem entitled "Sestina: Like," written by A.E. Stallings. It is a fixed verse type of poem which consists of<em> six stanzas.</em> Every stanza has<u> six lines. </u>
The repetition of versions of the word "like" at the end of the lines allows the poem to focus on its subject matter. This allows the central concept of the poem to be unified. It also shows that the poet used the word "like" as a play on words because it provides "humor" to what is happening in the society today.
So, this concludes that <u>using the word "like" doesn't mean the poet has a limited vocabulary.</u>
Thus, this explains the answer.
Answer:
The decision of an ethics review committee about Dr. Franklin's research proposal is:
A:The proposal is approved, as it meets the ethical guidelines defined by the APA.
Explanation:
APA (American Psychological Association) has ethical guidelines for conducting psychological researches. The most relevant one in this case is: "follow informed-consent rules." Dr. Franklin clearly ensures that his students give their consents to participate in the eyewitness testimony study by having each sign a form to agree to participate in the research. I am also sure that the confidentiality and privacy of subjects (students who participate in the research) will be highly protected, in line with another guideline of APA, because these issues have not raised any controversy.
Answer:
Part A:
The cofounding variable is a factor that could cause a result on the experiment. This would be the people taking extra food.
Independent variable would be being asked to sign in or not and take free food, because independent variable is a variable that is changed or manipulated and in this case the people were split in half and the hypothesis is that the people who didn't sign in would take more food.
Operational definitions are important when conducting research because it defines all the variables in the experiment, so it can be replicated. The operational def for the dependent variable would be "Doing the right thing even though you aren't being watched"
Part B:
The data does not support the hypothesis because even the people who signed in could've taken extra food when the dean wasn't looking. The findings cannot be generalized to all students because some students could have been taught better and can differentiate between right and wrong. So the people who were not signed in could've just taken one burger and drink, and the people who were signed in might feel obligated to take more than one burger because they had signed in and didn't just come without signing in.
The study is not a naturalistic observation because the observer did not look at the people who took the food and which side took more food.
