An in depth study of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein would not be a short research paper. Ideally you would have to have a more specific research question/focus on one aspect of the novel. An in depth study is too broad.
An analysis of protagonists in Jane Austen's works once again would not be a short research paper, if it was limited to one or two of her books then yes but not all of them.
A comparison of Homers Illiad and Odyssey once again is too broad a topic and if you were to compare everything in both novels you would be looking at a rather lengthy research paper.
Moby D*ck is full of symbolism and if you could find a way to summarize effectively and succinctly the story and maybe just focus on the actual whale as the subject matter and what it represents in the book you could definitely make a good relatively short research paper out of it.
Alternatively would be an analysis of Edgar Allan Poe's narrative style in The Black Cat. The Black Cat is a short story and ideal for this type of research paper.
<u>Compare and contrast W. H. Auden's "Musée des Beaux Arts" and William Carlos Williams's "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus." </u>
<u>What similarities and differences do you see in the way the poets present ideas to the reader?</u>
The most important similarity between W.H. Auden and William Carlos Williams' poems is that both describe Pieter Brueghel's painting <em>Landscape With The Fall of Icarus</em>. Both poets illustrate the scene and all its surroundings with detail. Both poets exemplify with imagery the painting's scene and what it depicts.
<u>Nevertheless, the poets do differ in other elements:</u>
- Auden presents his poem using free verse and divides it into two long stanzas without any rhyme. Although William Carlos Williams doesn't use rhyme either, he keeps a more traditional construction by dividing the poem into six stanzas with three lines in each.
- Auden reflects on suffering and the burden of routine depicted in the painting with more delicate and meditative observations. He mentions Icarus in the second stanza and contemplates his psyche in a deeper way. Williams, on the other hand, presents his ideas in a concise manner. He states the reader the facts and describes the painting with concrete examples. He mentions Icarus since the first stanza but doesn't concentrate on what he might have felt or what others might be feeling in that precise moment.
- Auden sensed the painting and tells the reader his experience when he saw it. Williams is an observer. He tells the reader a descriptive summary of what he saw without delving into his inner experience and thoughts.
Here are my three proposals:
- Eliminate all welfare programs that took tedious process and transform it into unversal basic income (that will be given to all legal citizen without question)
- The government should create an institute that is specifically functioned to gather data regarding citizens' economic status
- Make all citizen required to report their economic status everytime they received a government help
The answer to the question :
How does Dr. Jekyll’s letter move the plot forward?
After reading the letter, Dr. Lanyon goes to Dr. Jekyll’s
house and argues with him.
After reading the letter, Dr. Lanyon forms a plan with Mr.
Utterson to help Dr. Jekyll.
After reading the letter, Dr. Lanyon reports Dr. Jekyll to
the police.
After reading the letter, Dr. Lanyon breaks into Dr.
Jekyll’s cabinet and takes his drawer.
Is:
<span>After reading the letter, Dr. Lanyon breaks into Dr. Jekyll’s cabinet and takes his drawer.</span>
"My ideal life in 15 years is me and my wife, sitting on the porch of our lake house watching our kids play. In order to reach that goal i can do great in my classes and follow a significant career path."
