Which of the following factors might influence a judge's decision as to how to resolve a case before him or her?

History

2 answers:

inn [45]2 years ago

6 0

4.) all of the above are factors involved in judicial decision making.

pochemuha2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

4all of the above are factors involved in judicial decision-making

Explanation:

The judge is the person who resolves a dispute or decides the fate of an accused, taking into account the evidence or evidence presented in a trial, administering justice. It is appropriate to distinguish the judge from the court, which is not legally a human being, but a judicial body composed of natural persons, who can rotate without violating this guarantee.

They are usually considered employees or public officials, although this will depend on the country in particular, are remunerated by the State (without prejudice to the figure of arbitrators and judges of peace), and integrate the so-called Judiciary. In general, they are characterized by their autonomy, independence and irremovability, without being able to be dismissed from their positions except for the causes established constitutionally or legally. They are also responsible for their ministerial, civil and criminal acts.

You might be interested in

3. Both Confucianism and Buddhism have had enormous influence outside the regions where they began. Explain how their influence

Fiesta28 [93]

Well they could be spread through cultural diffusion. Trade brought different groups of people together causing the cultural diffusion and the advances in technology caused trade. Hope I helped :)

7 0

2 years ago

What ideas and inventions encouraged Europeans to begin overseas exploration?

IceJOKER [234]

The idea of finding riches and luxury items (gold,spices,silks,ect) as for inventions I think of a star map

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Match the rulers of England to their descriptions.

Aliun [14]

William III: Constitutional monarchy
Charles I: authoritarian leader of Commonwealth
James I: Absolute monarchy

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Japanese losses were staggering in comparison: an estimated 1.74 million killed or missing, and 94,000 wounded. Few Japanese tro

mars1129 [50]

It does contradict Leahy's opinion.

Because Japanese soldiers were willing to fight to the death and even commit suicide, and their casualties were already high.

3 0

2 years ago

What problems do Mchanagma and Verdirame see with the current state of human rights in the international system in their article

sineoko [7]

Answer and Explanation:

Jacob Mchangama and Guglielmo Verdirame, in their article “The Danger of Human Rights Proliferation,” defend liberty by the motto of “less are more.”

We are asserting more and more rights without checking out the implementation of previous rights. Asserting more rights and convincing the states to add them in treaties would not lead to more excellent protection of human rights.

The proliferation of rights is more harmful to humans because human rights are not protected fully as we are expanding the number of rights in treaties.

They argued that: “If human rights were a currency, its value would be free fall……..this currency is buy cover for dictatorships ”

Rights of human language have been used to restrict rights. Freedom of religion and expression was a foundation of human rights, but states also restricted those rights in the name of human rights.

To sum up, the proliferation of human rights does not ensure that the rights of humans are being secured. States are not always concerned directly with the welfare of humans but to restrict those rights more. So the proliferation of rights is not fruitful but a dangerous thing.

8 0

2 years ago