All categories

2 years ago

How do dogs react when they see gods or goddesses?

English

2 answers:

Strike441 [17]2 years ago

8 0

They Cannot See the Gods??

Lapatulllka [165]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The Last Answer

Explanation:

dogs are just like humans they cannot see gods because gods are spirits and spirits are impossible to see if we did see them they would be flying all over and you would see people in the sky

You might be interested in

Read the excerpt from Hamlet, Act I, Scene i. Marcellus: What! has this thing appear’d again to-night? Bernardo: I have seen not

Anna [14]

Read the excerpt from Hamlet, Act I, Scene i.

Marcellus: What! has this thing appear’d again to-night?

Bernardo: I have seen nothing.

Marcellus: Horatio says ’tis but our fantasy,

And will not let belief take hold of him

Touching this dreaded sight twice seen of us:

Therefore I have entreated him along

With us to watch the minutes of this night;

What is the effect of this dialogue?

It creates an air of suspense in the plot.

It shows how angry the characters are.

It describes details of the castle setting.

It entertains through the use of clever wording.

The answer to this question is........... A

6 0

2 years ago

Read the excerpt from "Save the Coral Reefs.”

svetoff [14.1K]

<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.

Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.

Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which best express the narrator's motivation in the following sentence from the fourth paragraph?

pogonyaev

He is joking. D) He is joking because Mr. Brishner is fat and slovenly

7 0

2 years ago

What effect does Bryant’s use of personification of nature have on the theme of the poem "Thanatopsis"? Cite evidence from the t

Inessa [10]

<span>Nature, for Bryant, does not have much consolation to offer to the reader who is experiencing depressing thoughts about death. The best Bryant can say is that it happens to everybody and that Nature will continue to exist in all its wonder and beauty after we are gone.</span>

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Choose the word that best defines the italicized word from the novel Frankenstein

a_sh-v [17]

Frankenstein, also known as The Modern Prometheus, written by Mary Shelley and published in 1818 for its first edition, tells the story of Victor Frankenstein, a scientist who creates a creature conscious creature, going against all kinds of scientific principles.

When we try to understand vocabulary, in whatever document, we need to use the context and also clue words to gather the meaning of unknown words. In this case, the sentence is talking about a sense of guilt, of something done wrong. It also talks about forgiveness, which is being reflected on given the situation spoken about. Given this, exculpation has to do with being forgiven, or not being found guilty about something. This is why the correct answer is A, acquitted. Both words mean the same thing; being not found guilty, or being exhonerated of guilt for something done.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers